OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive blood pressure measured from the superficial temporal artery has been shown to correlate well with pressure in the brachial artery. The supraorbital artery may be an even better site for monitoring blood pressure on the forehead because it originates from the internal carotid artery, and it is easier to locate anatomically. This study compares mean pressure measured oscillometrically over the supraorbital artery and at the upper arm. METHODS: Oscillometric signals from the supraorbital artery were recorded in 20 surgical patients under general anesthesia using a 2.5- x 1-cm bladder attached to the forehead with a self-adhesive pad. Blood pressure was measured simultaneously from the arm using a Dinamap 1846 blood pressure monitor, and the resulting data compared with the supraorbital artery measurements. RESULTS: The mean difference between 219 pairs of blood pressure measurements, from the forehead and the arm, was 3.8 mm Hg. The standard deviation of the differences was 7.4 mm Hg. The linear regression equation for the data was y = 0.98x + 3.25, with a standard error of estimate of 7.31 mm Hg. The correlation coefficient between the two measurements was 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that mean blood pressures measured oscillometrically from the supraorbital and brachial arteries agree and correlate well with each other. The supraorbital artery should be a good alternative site for blood pressure measurement.
OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive blood pressure measured from the superficial temporal artery has been shown to correlate well with pressure in the brachial artery. The supraorbital artery may be an even better site for monitoring blood pressure on the forehead because it originates from the internal carotid artery, and it is easier to locate anatomically. This study compares mean pressure measured oscillometrically over the supraorbital artery and at the upper arm. METHODS: Oscillometric signals from the supraorbital artery were recorded in 20 surgical patients under general anesthesia using a 2.5- x 1-cm bladder attached to the forehead with a self-adhesive pad. Blood pressure was measured simultaneously from the arm using a Dinamap 1846 blood pressure monitor, and the resulting data compared with the supraorbital artery measurements. RESULTS: The mean difference between 219 pairs of blood pressure measurements, from the forehead and the arm, was 3.8 mm Hg. The standard deviation of the differences was 7.4 mm Hg. The linear regression equation for the data was y = 0.98x + 3.25, with a standard error of estimate of 7.31 mm Hg. The correlation coefficient between the two measurements was 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that mean blood pressures measured oscillometrically from the supraorbital and brachial arteries agree and correlate well with each other. The supraorbital artery should be a good alternative site for blood pressure measurement.