Literature DB >> 8862992

Use of a coded postcard to maintain anonymity in a highly sensitive mail survey: cost, response rates, and bias.

D A Asch1.   

Abstract

In a survey about euthanasia, 1,600 critical care nurses were randomly assigned to receive either three complete, anonymous mailings of the questionnaire or, with each mailing, a coded postcard to be returned separately from the questionnaire to reduce subsequent mailings to previous responders. The response rate in these two groups was 76.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 73.6-79.4%] and 69% (95% CI = 65.7-72.4%), respectively. The two strategies yielded similar responses, and costs were much lower for the postcard group. Using coded postcards to be returned separately from completed instruments appears to lower the response rate to anonymous mail surveys, but it also lowers cost and may not introduce additional bias.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8862992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  5 in total

1.  Health and health care among housestaff in four U.S. internal medicine residency programs.

Authors:  I M Rosen; J D Christie; L M Bellini; D A Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: three randomized trials.

Authors:  Elie A Akl; Swarna Gaddam; Reem Mustafa; Mark C Wilson; Andrew Symons; Ann Grifasi; Denise McGuigan; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maureen Murdoch; Alisha Baines Simon; Melissa Anderson Polusny; Ann Kay Bangerter; Joseph Patrick Grill; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Melissa Ruth Partin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

5.  Effect of numbering of return envelopes on participation, explicit refusals, and bias: experiment and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas V Perneger; Stéphane Cullati; Sandrine Rudaz; Thomas Agoritsas; Ralph E Schmidt; Christophe Combescure; Delphine S Courvoisier
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.