D Shaffer1. 1. Irving Philips Professor of Child Psychiatry, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York 10032, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the process of creating the DSM-IV from a participant's perspective. METHOD: Narrative review. RESULTS: In its attempt to address the perceived weaknesses of both the content and development of the DSM-III and DSM-III-R, the DSM-IV development was based on commissioned reviews for sets of diagnoses, especially designed field trials and a transparent decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS: Nosology is an ambitious and complicated enterprise. Classification systems must evolve as new empirical evidence is presented. Many of the obstacles faced by the DSM-IV work groups, therefore, may be moot for those formulating DSM-V. The DSM-IV development process was carefully planned, and the profession is indebted to the American Psychiatric Association (APA) for its initiative and effort in producing this system.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the process of creating the DSM-IV from a participant's perspective. METHOD: Narrative review. RESULTS: In its attempt to address the perceived weaknesses of both the content and development of the DSM-III and DSM-III-R, the DSM-IV development was based on commissioned reviews for sets of diagnoses, especially designed field trials and a transparent decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS: Nosology is an ambitious and complicated enterprise. Classification systems must evolve as new empirical evidence is presented. Many of the obstacles faced by the DSM-IV work groups, therefore, may be moot for those formulating DSM-V. The DSM-IV development process was carefully planned, and the profession is indebted to the American Psychiatric Association (APA) for its initiative and effort in producing this system.