AIMS: To examine general practitioners' confidence in the diagnosis and management of urinary incontinence, to define their unmet continence training and educational needs, and to evaluate the current provision of continence care in general practice, including the role of practice nurses. METHODS: A pre-tested postal questionnaire was sent to 600 general practitioners throughout New Zealand to obtain information about their demography and training in incontinence management, their confidence in diagnosis and treatment, and their perceptions of met and unmet educational needs in continence care. They were also asked about current provision of continence promotion in their practice and their views on the role of practice nurses in caring for incontinent patients. Confidence data were recorded on five point scales and analysed using chi square tests. Cluster analysis was used to describe groups with different opinions on practice nurses' roles. RESULTS: The response rate from eligible contacts was 81.3%. Although most respondents provide continence care, only 2.6% offered special clinics for continence promotion. Fewer than half felt confident to diagnose the causes of incontinence. Confidence in managing incontinence in children was consistently lower than for other incontinence presentations. There was no difference by sex in confidence in caring for incontinent patients although female respondents were more likely to consider management of continence care part of a practice nurse's role (chi 2 = 47.5, p < 0.01) and to routinely ask well women about incontinence (chi 2 = 243.6, p < 0.01). Most respondents (71.9%) could not remember having had any formal training in the management of incontinence at either undergraduate or postgraduate level. Recall of postgraduate education was associated with greater levels of confidence in management of continence problems. There was general agreement that it was appropriate to include training in continence management in vocational and continuing medical education. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of general practitioners perceive a lack of adequate medical training in incontinence care at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. There is a need for improved education for both general practitioners and practice nurses.
AIMS: To examine general practitioners' confidence in the diagnosis and management of urinary incontinence, to define their unmet continence training and educational needs, and to evaluate the current provision of continence care in general practice, including the role of practice nurses. METHODS: A pre-tested postal questionnaire was sent to 600 general practitioners throughout New Zealand to obtain information about their demography and training in incontinence management, their confidence in diagnosis and treatment, and their perceptions of met and unmet educational needs in continence care. They were also asked about current provision of continence promotion in their practice and their views on the role of practice nurses in caring for incontinentpatients. Confidence data were recorded on five point scales and analysed using chi square tests. Cluster analysis was used to describe groups with different opinions on practice nurses' roles. RESULTS: The response rate from eligible contacts was 81.3%. Although most respondents provide continence care, only 2.6% offered special clinics for continence promotion. Fewer than half felt confident to diagnose the causes of incontinence. Confidence in managing incontinence in children was consistently lower than for other incontinence presentations. There was no difference by sex in confidence in caring for incontinentpatients although female respondents were more likely to consider management of continence care part of a practice nurse's role (chi 2 = 47.5, p < 0.01) and to routinely ask well women about incontinence (chi 2 = 243.6, p < 0.01). Most respondents (71.9%) could not remember having had any formal training in the management of incontinence at either undergraduate or postgraduate level. Recall of postgraduate education was associated with greater levels of confidence in management of continence problems. There was general agreement that it was appropriate to include training in continence management in vocational and continuing medical education. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of general practitioners perceive a lack of adequate medical training in incontinence care at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels. There is a need for improved education for both general practitioners and practice nurses.
Authors: Donna Mazloomdoost; Lauren B Westermann; Catrina C Crisp; Susan H Oakley; Steven D Kleeman; Rachel N Pauls Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Stacy M Lenger; Christine M Chu; Chiara Ghetti; Angela C Hardi; H Henry Lai; Ratna Pakpahan; Jerry L Lowder; Siobhan Sutcliffe Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 2.894