Literature DB >> 8862320

Technetium-99m-DMSA renal cortical scintigraphy to detect experimental acute pyelonephritis in piglets: comparison of planar (pinhole) and SPECT imaging.

M Majd1, H G Rushton, R Chandra, M P Andrich, C P Tardif, F Rashti.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of SPECT and pinhole imaging for the detection of acute pyelonephritis using histology as the standard of reference.
METHODS: Bilateral vesicoureteral reflux of infected urine was induced in 16 piglets (32 kidneys) by unroofing the intravesical ureter and subsequently instilling a broth culture of E. coli into the bladder. DMSA scans were obtained by both pinhole and SPECT techniques at 24 hr (4 piglets), 48 hr (5 piglets), 72 hr (4 piglets) and 10 days (3 piglets) after instillation of bacteria into the bladder. Kidneys were harvested immediately after scintigraphy for histopathologic examination. Results of the SPECT images, pinhole images and histologic findings were interpreted independently in a blinded fashion. The images of each kidney were classified as positive or negative for pyelonephritis regardless of the severity and number of lesions. To evaluate accuracy of SPECT and pinhole imaging for the detection of individual lesions, each kidney was arbitrarily divided into three zones (upper, middle and lower). Image findings were then compared with the pathology results for the presence or absence of pyelonephritis in each zone.
RESULTS: Histopathology revealed pyelonephritis in 24 of 32 kidneys (58 of 96 zones). The sensitivity of the DMSA scan for detection of affected kidneys was 92% for SPECT and 83% for pinhole; overall accuracy was 88% for both. The sensitivity of SPECT for the detection of affected renal zones was slightly better than pinhole imaging (91% compared with 86%), but its specificity was lower (82% compared with 95%) resulting in a similar accuracy. Excluding four piglets where scans were obtained within 24 hr after instillation of bacteria into the bladder, the sensitivity of SPECT and pinhole for the detection of affected kidneys were 95% and 90%, respectively. Their overall accuracy were 96% and 92%. In this subgroup, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SPECT for the detection of involved zones were 96%, 95% and 96%, respectively. The corresponding values for pinhole imaging were 90%, 95% and 92%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Although the sensitivity of SPECT for the detection of acute pyelonephritis is slightly better than pinhole DMSA scan, the overall accuracy of these two imaging techniques is essentially the same.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8862320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  10 in total

1.  Diagnostic significance of clinical and laboratory findings to localize site of urinary infection.

Authors:  Eduardo H Garin; Fernando Olavarria; Carlos Araya; Monica Broussain; Claudia Barrera; Linda Young
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Power Doppler sonographic evaluation of acute childhood pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Mitra Basiratnia; Amir Hossein Noohi; Mehrzad Lotfi; Mehr Sadat Alavi
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Acute pyelonephritis and sequelae of renal scar in pediatric first febrile urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Kuang-Yen Lin; Nan-Tsing Chiu; Mei-Ju Chen; Ching-Horng Lai; Jeng-Jong Huang; Yu-Tai Wang; Yuan-Yow Chiou
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Risk Factors for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection and Renal Scarring.

Authors:  Ron Keren; Nader Shaikh; Hans Pohl; Lisa Gravens-Mueller; Anastasia Ivanova; Lisa Zaoutis; Melissa Patel; Rachel deBerardinis; Allison Parker; Sonika Bhatnagar; Mary Ann Haralam; Marcia Pope; Diana Kearney; Bruce Sprague; Raquel Barrera; Bernarda Viteri; Martina Egigueron; Neha Shah; Alejandro Hoberman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Host and Bacterial Markers that Differ in Children with Cystitis and Pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Nader Shaikh; Judith M Martin; Alejandro Hoberman; Megan Skae; Linette Milkovich; Andrew Nowalk; Christi McElheny; Robert W Hickey; Diana Kearney; Massoud Majd; Eglal Shalaby-Rana; George Tseng; John F Alcorn; Jay Kolls; Marcia Kurs-Lasky; Zhiguang Huo; William Horne; Greg Lockhart; Hans Pohl; Timothy R Shope
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Renal scarring sequelae in childhood Kawasaki disease.

Authors:  Jieh-Neng Wang; Yuan-Yow Chiou; Nan-Tsing Chiu; Mei-Ju Chen; Bi-Fang Lee; Jing-Ming Wu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Power Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute childhood pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Raphael Halevy; Vladislav Smolkin; Sergey Bykov; Leonid Chervinsky; Waheeb Sakran; Ariel Koren
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  The effects of methylene blue on renal scarring due to pyelonephritis in rats.

Authors:  Burhan Aksu; Mustafa Inan; Mehmet Kanter; Fulya Oz Puyan; Hafize Uzun; Gulay Durmus-Altun; Saban Gurcan; Seval Aydin; Suleyman Ayvaz; Mehmet Pul
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Value of comprehensive renal ultrasound in children with acute urinary tract infection for assessment of renal involvement: comparison with DMSA scintigraphy and final diagnosis.

Authors:  Peter Brader; Michael Riccabona; Thomas Schwarz; Ursula Seebacher; Ekkehard Ring
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Sex effects in pyelonephritis.

Authors:  Clayton D Albracht; Teri N Hreha; David A Hunstad
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.714

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.