Literature DB >> 8862318

Derivation of input function from FDG-PET studies in small hearts.

H M Wu1, S C Huang, V Allada, P J Wolfenden, H R Schelbert, M E Phelps, C K Hoh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The extraction of pure arterial time-activity curves (TACs) from dynamic PET images of a small animal heart using factor analysis of dynamic structures (FADS) was found to be unsuccessful due to the small size of the cardiac chamber that causes extensive mixture of TACs of different structures.
METHODS: In this study, we used digital phantoms of the left ventricle (LV cavity size: 1-2 cm) and small monkey (LV cavity size: approximately 2 cm) dynamic FDG PET studies to evaluate FADS for extracting the pure blood-pool TACs by adding a single blood sample (taken at a late scan time) constraint.
RESULTS: In the digital phantom studies, spillover fractions in the extracted blood-pool TACs using FADS without a blood sample constraint (FADS(-)) and with a blood sample constraint (FADS(+)) were 3%-91% and < 3%, respectively. In the monkey studies (n = 4), FADS(+) extracted blood-pool TACs matched well with the arterialized well counter measurements (% differences of curve integration; FADS(-) < 82%; FADS(+) < 9%). The microparameters (K1*, k2*, k3*, k4*) and macroparameters (Knlr), obtained from the FADS(+) blood-pool TACs, were similar to those obtained from plasma samples in a three-compartment model fitting (% differences of Knlr:phantom studies < 5%; monkey studies < 9%).
CONCLUSION: The FADS technique with a single-blood sample has the potential to extract the pure blood-pool TACs directly from dynamic PET images of a small animal without multiple blood sampling, region of interest definition or spillover correction.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8862318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  11 in total

Review 1.  Determination of the Input Function at the Entry of the Tissue of Interest and Its Impact on PET Kinetic Modeling Parameters.

Authors:  M'hamed Bentourkia
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  An internet-based "kinetic imaging system" (KIS) for MicroPET.

Authors:  Sung-Cheng Huang; David Truong; Hsiao-Ming Wu; Arion F Chatziioannou; Weber Shao; Anna M Wu; Michael E Phelps
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Hybrid image and blood sampling input function for quantification of small animal dynamic PET data.

Authors:  Kooresh I Shoghi; Michael J Welch
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  A method for generating image-derived input function in quantitative 18F-FDG PET study based on the monotonicity of the input and output function curve.

Authors:  Shan Zhou; Kewei Chen; Eric M Reiman; De-min Li; Baoci Shan
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.690

5.  Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.

Authors:  Ju-Chieh Kevin Cheng; Kooresh Shoghi; Richard Laforest
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Development of an H(2)(15)O steady-state method combining a bolus and slow increasing injection with a multiprogramming syringe pump.

Authors:  Masato Kobayashi; Yasushi Kiyono; Rikiya Maruyama; Tetsuya Mori; Keiichi Kawai; Hidehiko Okazawa
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Improved derivation of input function in dynamic mouse [18F]FDG PET using bladder radioactivity kinetics.

Authors:  Koon-Pong Wong; Xiaoli Zhang; Sung-Cheng Huang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Kinetic quantitation of cerebral PET-FDG studies without concurrent blood sampling: statistical recovery of the arterial input function.

Authors:  F O'Sullivan; J Kirrane; M Muzi; J N O'Sullivan; A M Spence; D A Mankoff; K A Krohn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Estimation of the 18F-FDG input function in mice by use of dynamic small-animal PET and minimal blood sample data.

Authors:  Gregory Z Ferl; Xiaoli Zhang; Hsiao-Ming Wu; Michael C Kreissl; Sung-Cheng Huang
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  The effects of anesthetic agent and carrier gas on blood glucose and tissue uptake in mice undergoing dynamic FDG-PET imaging: sevoflurane and isoflurane compared in air and in oxygen.

Authors:  Judith E Flores; Leanne M McFarland; Alexander Vanderbilt; Annie K Ogasawara; Simon-Peter Williams
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.