Literature DB >> 8861689

Physical work capacity in dynamic exercise with differing muscle masses in healthy young and older men.

T Aminoff1, J Smolander, O Korhonen, V Louhevaara.   

Abstract

Ten young (aged 23-30 years) and nine older (aged 54-59 years) healthy men with similar estimated limb muscle volumes performed, in random order, three different types of ergometer exercise tests (one-arm cranking, two-arm cranking, and two-leg cycling) up to the maximal level. Values for work load (WL), peak oxygen consumption (V0(2)), peak heart rate (HR), peak ventilation (V(E)), respiratory gas exchange ratio (R), recovery blood lactate concentration [La-], and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were compared between the age-groups in the given exercise modes. No significant age-related differences in WL, peak V0(2), peak HR, R, [La-], or RPE were found in one-arm or two-arm cranking. During one-arm cranking the mean peak V0(2) was 1.65 (SD 0.26)1*min(-1) among the young men and 1.63 (SD 0.10)l*min(-1) among the older men. Corresponding mean peak V0(2) during two-arm cranking was 2.19 (SD 0.32)1*min(-1) and 2.09 (SD 0.18)1*min(-1), respectively. During one-arm cranking peak V(E) was higher (P <0.05) among the older men compared to the young men. During two-leg cycling the young men showed higher values in WL (P <0.001), peak V0(2) (P <0.001), and peak HR (P <0.001). The mean peak V0(2) was 3.54 (SD 0.24)1*min(-1) among the young men and 3.02 (SD 0.20)1 . min(-1) among the older men. Corresponding mean peak HR was 182 (SD 5) beats*min(-1) and 170 (SD 8) beats*min(-1), respectively. During two-leg cycling, peak V(E), R, [La-], and RPE did not differ between the two age-groups. In summary, the older men with similar sizes of estimated arm and leg muscle volumes as the young men had a reduced physical work capacity in two-leg cycling. In one-arm or two-arm cranking, no significant difference in work capacity was found between the age-groups. These results indicate, that in healthy men, age, at least up to the 6th decade of life, is not necessarily associated with a decline in physical work capacity in exercises using relatively small muscle groups, in which the limiting factors are more peripheral than central.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8861689     DOI: 10.1007/bf00262829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  14 in total

Review 1.  Aerobic fitness norms for males and females aged 6 to 75 years: a review.

Authors:  E Shvartz; R C Reibold
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1990-01

2.  Physiological responses to standardised arm work.

Authors:  C T Davies; A J Sargeant
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

Review 4.  Changes in skeletal muscle with aging: effects of exercise training.

Authors:  M A Rogers; W J Evans
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Capacity for vasodilatation in the forearms of manual and office workers.

Authors:  J Smolander
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

Review 6.  The ageing muscle.

Authors:  G Grimby; B Saltin
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  1983-06

7.  A physiological comparison of young and older endurance athletes.

Authors:  G W Heath; J M Hagberg; A A Ehsani; J O Holloszy
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1981-09

8.  Muscle mass as a factor limiting physical work.

Authors:  R J Shephard; E Bouhlel; H Vandewalle; H Monod
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-04

9.  Role of muscle loss in the age-associated reduction in VO2 max.

Authors:  J L Fleg; E G Lakatta
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-09

10.  Active forearm blood flow adjustments to handgrip exercise in young and older healthy men.

Authors:  J L Jasperse; D R Seals; R Callister
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perceived exertion is elevated in old age during an isometric fatigue task.

Authors:  Brian L Allman; Charles L Rice
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS COMPARING CARDIOPULMONARY EXERCISE TEST VALUES OBTAINED FROM THE ARM CYCLE AND THE LEG CYCLE RESPECTIVELY IN HEALTHY ADULTS.

Authors:  Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen; Jan Christensen; Lars Hermann Tang; Camilla Keller; Patrick Doherty; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Rod S Taylor; Henning Langberg
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Perceived exertion : influence of age and cognitive development.

Authors:  Alain Groslambert; Anthony D Mahon
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effects of Aging on Perceived Exertion and Pain During Arm Cranking in Women 70 to 80 YEARS OLD.

Authors:  Alain Groslambert; Céline C Grange; Stéphane Perrey; Jérôme Maire; Nicolas Tordi; Jean Denis Rouillon
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Rating of perceived exertion during two different constant-load exercise intensities during arm cranking in paraplegic and able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Harran Al-Rahamneh; Roger Eston
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Ratings of Perceived Exertion Misclassify Intensities for Sedentary Older Adults During Graded Cycling Test: Effect of Supramaximal High-Intensity Interval Training.

Authors:  Georges Jabbour; Lina Majed
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.