Literature DB >> 8860906

Estimation of fractal dimension in radiographs.

J F Veenland1, J L Grashius, F van der Meer, A L Beckers, E S Gelsema.   

Abstract

In the last decade, the fractal dimension has become a popular parameter to characterize image textures. Also in radiographs, various procedures have been used to estimate the fractal dimension. However, certain characteristics of the radiographic process, e.g., noise and blurring, interfere with the straightforward application of these estimation methods. In this study, the influence of quantum noise and image blur on several estimation methods was quantified by simulating the effect of quantum noise and the effect of modulation transfer functions, corresponding with different screen-film combinations, on computer generated fractal images. The results are extrapolated to explain the effect of film-grain noise on fractal dimension estimation. The effect of noise is that, irrespective of the noise source, the fractal dimension is overestimated, especially for lower fractal dimensions. On the other hand, blurring results in an underestimation of the dimensions. The effect of blurring is dependent on the estimation method used; the dimension estimates by the power spectrum method are lowered with a constant value, whereas the underestimation by the methods working in the spatial domain is dependent on the given dimension. The influence of the MTF and noise on fractal dimension estimation seriously limits the comparability of fractal dimensions estimated from radiographs which differ in noise content or MTF. Only when the power spectrum method is used, it is possible to correct for the influence of different MTFs of screen-film combinations. It is concluded that only when using the same object-focus distance, the same exposure conditions, the same digitizer at the same resolution, can fractal dimensions as estimated in radiographs be reliably compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8860906     DOI: 10.1118/1.597816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Texture analysis of medical images for radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  Elisa Scalco; Giovanna Rizzo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Relationship between bone mineral density and trabecular bone pattern in postmenopausal osteoporotic Brazilian women.

Authors:  Matheus Lima Oliveira; Esio Fortaleza Nascimento Chaves Pedrosa; Adriana Dibo Cruz; Francsico Haiter-Neto; Francisco Jose Albuquerque Paula; Plauto Christopher Aranha Watanabe
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Fractal and Fourier analysis of the hepatic sinusoidal network in normal and cirrhotic rat liver.

Authors:  Eugenio Gaudio; Slawomir Chaberek; Andrea Montella; Luigi Pannarale; Sergio Morini; Gilnardo Novelli; Federica Borghese; Davide Conte; Kazimierz Ostrowski
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; T Jämsä; E-M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; M T Nieminen; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Directional fractal signature methods for trabecular bone texture in hand radiographs: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  M Wolski; P Podsiadlo; G W Stachowiak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Radiographic trabecular 2D and 3D parameters of proximal femoral bone cores correlate with each other and with yield stress.

Authors:  D Steines; S-W Liew; C Arnaud; R Vargas-Voracek; A Nazarian; R Müller; B Snyder; P Hess; P Lang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Franciotti; M Moharrami; A Quaranta; M E Bizzoca; A Piattelli; G Aprile; V Perrotti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Scale-specific multifractal medical image analysis.

Authors:  Boris Braverman; Mauro Tambasco
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.238

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.