Literature DB >> 8860729

Behavioural evidence that magnetic field effects in the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis, might not depend on magnetite or induced electric currents.

F S Prato1, M Kavaliers, J J Carson.   

Abstract

Although extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields (<300 Hz) appear to exert a variety of biological effects, the magnetic field sensing/transduction mechanism(s) remains to be established. Here, using the inhibitory effects of magnetic fields on endogenous opioid peptide-mediated "analgaesic" response of the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis, we addressed the mechanism(s) of action of ELF magnetic fields. Indirect mechanisms involving both induced electric fields and direct magnetic field detection mechanisms (e.g., magnetite, parametric resonance) were evaluated. Snails were exposed to a static magnetic field (B(DC) = 78 +/- 1 mu T) and to a 60 Hz magnetic field (B(AC) = 299 +/- 1 mu T peak) with the angle between the static and 60 Hz magnetic fields varied in eight steps between 0 degrees and 90 degrees. At 0 degrees and 90 degrees, the magnetic field reduced opioid-induced analgaesia by approximately 20 percent, and this inhibition was increased to a maximum of 50 percent when the angle was between 50 degrees and 70 degrees. Because B(AC) was fixed in amplitude, direction, and frequency, any induced electric currents would be constant independent of the B(AC)/B(DC) angle. Also, an energy transduction mechanism involving magnetite should show greatest sensitivity at 90 degrees. Therefore, the energy transduction mechanism probably does not involve induced electric currents or magnetite. Rather, our results suggest a direct magnetic field detection mechanism consistent with the parametric resonance model proposed by Lednev.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8860729     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:2<123::AID-BEM6>3.0.CO;2-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  5 in total

1.  Shielding, but not zeroing of the ambient magnetic field reduces stress-induced analgesia in mice.

Authors:  E Choleris; C Del Seppia; A W Thomas; P Luschi; G Ghione; G R Moran; F S Prato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Light alters nociceptive effects of magnetic field shielding in mice: intensity and wavelength considerations.

Authors:  Frank S Prato; Dawn Desjardins-Holmes; Lynn D Keenliside; Julia C McKay; John A Robertson; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Spatial learning in deer mice: sex differences and the effects of endogenous opioids and 60 Hz magnetic fields.

Authors:  M Kavaliers; K P Ossenkopp; F S Prato; D G Innes; L A Galea; D M Kinsella; T S Perrot-Sinal
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Deficits in water maze performance and oxidative stress in the hippocampus and striatum induced by extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure.

Authors:  Yonghua Cui; Zhiqiang Ge; Joshua Dominic Rizak; Chao Zhai; Zhu Zhou; Songjie Gong; Yi Che
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Studies on effects of static electric field exposure on liver in mice.

Authors:  Qinhao Lin; Li Dong; Yaqian Xu; Guoqing Di
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.