Literature DB >> 8860283

Cesarean section rates by type of maternity unit and level of obstetric care: an area-based study in central Italy.

D Di Lallo1, C A Perucci, R Bertollini, S Mallone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of cesarean section in the Lazio region of Italy is one of the highest in the Western world, 26.5%. In order to evaluate the effects of nonmedical factors on cesarean section, we examined its relationship to the characteristics of maternity units in the region.
METHODS: We collected data from the birth certificates of 91,557 infants born to women residing in Lazio in 1988-1989 and classified all maternity units in the region by method of financing (public, semiprivate with arrangements with the national health service, and completely private) and level of obstetric care (unclassified and levels I,II, and III). The rates of cesarean section were examined for primiparous and multiparous women, taking into account birthweight, gestational age, fetal presentation, maternal age, and day of delivery.
RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio for cesarean section (with public units of level I taken as reference) was 1.06 (primiparous) and 1.22 (multiparous) for semiprivate maternity units and 1.59 (primiparous) and 1.52 (multiparous) for private units; it increased to 1.59 (primiparous) and 1.61 (multiparous) for unclassified semiprivate units and to 2.06 (primiparous) and 1.87 (multiparous) for unclassified private units.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of cesarean section was associated in the Lazio region with private payment for hospital care and with inadequate level of obstetric care. The latter factor is of particular concern and should be investigated elsewhere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8860283     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  7 in total

1.  The effect of income pooling within a call group on rates of obstetric intervention.

Authors:  E S Bland; L W Oppenheimer; P Holmes; S W Wen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.

Authors:  Maria P Fantini; Elisa Stivanello; Brunella Frammartino; Anna P Barone; Danilo Fusco; Laura Dallolio; Paolo Cacciari; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery in first pregnancy?

Authors:  Ali Gholami; Shaker Salarilak
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-04

4.  Private health care coverage and increased risk of obstetric intervention.

Authors:  Jennifer E Lutomski; Michael Murphy; Declan Devane; Sarah Meaney; Richard A Greene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Comparison between public and private sectors of care and disparities in adverse neonatal outcomes following emergency intrapartum cesarean at term - A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Woonji Jang; Christopher Flatley; Ristan M Greer; Sailesh Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Health system factors and caesarean sections in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Alban Fejza; Mrika Aliu; Peter Jüni; David C Goodman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Financing Maternity and Early Childhood Healthcare in The Australian Healthcare System: Costs to Funders in Private and Public Hospitals Over the First 1000 Days.

Authors:  Emily Callander; Antonia Shand; David Ellwood; Haylee Fox; Natasha Nassar
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2021-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.