Literature DB >> 8859141

Variability in physicians' reported ordering and perceived reassurance value of diagnostic tests in children with 'growing pains'.

C Macarthur1, J G Wright, R Srivastava, W Rosser, W Feldman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the variability in the reported ordering of tests and treatment and to determine physicians' perceptions of the reassurance value to families of diagnostic tests in children with "growing pains."
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using a mailed questionnaire. SETTINGS: Primary care and referral practices in Toronto, Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: University-affiliated primary care pediatricians and family physicians were surveyed, as well as all pediatric orthopedic surgeons and pediatric rheumatologists in Ontario. Pediatric orthopedic surgeons and pediatric rheumatologists were combined into a single group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of office visits because of growing pains, frequency of diagnostic testing, management strategies for these children, and physicians' perceptions of the reassurance value of diagnostic tests.
RESULTS: Of 205 eligible physicians, 181 (88.3%) responded. The median reported frequency of office visits because of growing pains was 1%. Compared with the other physician groups, family physicians were significantly more likely to order a determination of the hemoglobin level (P = .003), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = .01), white blood cell count (P = .01), and differential blood cell count (P = .003), but not imaging tests. Family physicians were also more likely to order diagnostic tests when they were under parental pressure to do so (P = .001) or for the child with repeated visits (P = .02). In total, 86% of pediatric orthopedic surgeons and pediatric rheumatologists, 95% of pediatricians, and 100% of family physicians perceived normal test results to be reassuring to parents. Treatment strategies were similar across the 3 physician groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of diagnostic testing varied among physician groups. Virtually all physicians perceived normal test results to be reassuring to families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8859141     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170350074013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  8 in total

1.  Growing pains.

Authors:  Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Bruce Arroll
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-02

2.  Correlates and predictors of paediatric leg pain: a case-control study.

Authors:  Angela Margaret Evans; Trupti Berde; Leila Karimi; Prajakta Ranade; Nehal Shah; Raju Khubchandani
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  [Growing Pains : Cause, Significance and Treatment].

Authors:  S Adolf; S Braun; A Meurer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  "Growing pains" in children are not associated with changes in vascular perfusion patterns in painful regions.

Authors:  Philip J Hashkes; Miguel Gorenberg; Victor Oren; Orit Friedland; Yosef Uziel
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Growing Pains.

Authors:  Patrick J Lehman; Rebecca L Carl
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  Clinical, laboratory characteristics and growth outcomes of children with growing pains.

Authors:  Chung-Yuan Liao; Li-Chieh Wang; Jyh-Hong Lee; Kuan-Wen Wu; Yu-Tsan Lin; Yao-Hsu Yang; Bor-Luen Chiang; Hsin-Hui Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Growing pains: contemporary knowledge and recommended practice.

Authors:  Angela M Evans
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Growing pains in children.

Authors:  Yosef Uziel; Philip J Hashkes
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.054

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.