Literature DB >> 8858491

The future of computer-assisted investigation of the polysomnogram: sleep microstructure.

S Kubicki1, W M Herrmann.   

Abstract

Previous attempts at automated analysis of sleep were mainly directed towards imitating the Rechtschaffen and Kales rules (RKR) in order to save scoring time and further objectify the procedure. RKR, however, do not take into consideration the sleep microstructure of REM, stage 2, and SWS. While the microstructure of stage 2 has been analyzed in the past decade, the microstructure of REM and SWS are virtually unknown. In stage 2 the amount and distribution of spindles, K complexes, and arousal reactions have been studied. At least two types of spindles (12/s and 14/s) with different dynamics and locations have been identified. Two different shapes for K complexes have been described: one related to external sensory stimuli with similarities to evoked potentials and another one more related to sinusoidal slow wave activity seen in SWS. These two different K complex shapes have different distributions and, obviously, different functions. The authors also suggest that one should differentiate between arousal reactions and true arousals. Recent investigations suggest two types of delta waves in SWS. The more sinusoidal 1-3/s delta waves with a frontal maximum are already seen with lower amplitude in late stage 2 and increase their amplitude and incidence towards stage 3 and Stage 4. The other delta-wave type is slower (< 1/s), polymorphic, and has varying amounts of theta and higher frequency waves superimposed. During REM sleep it seems to be important to separate phases with rapid eye movements from those with none (REM sine REM), and count the amount and distribution of sawtooth activity. Background activity during REM and REM sine REM, as well as intra- and interhemispheric coherence should be analyzed separately. Only if the microstructure of the sleep EEG can be analyzed automatically using newer techniques such as transformation into wavelets and pattern classification with neuronal networks, and only if we learn more about the importance of microstructure elements, can automated sleep analysis go beyond the limited information obtained from scoring according to RKR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8858491     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199607000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  7 in total

1.  Autoassociative MLP in sleep spindle detection.

Authors:  E Huupponen; A Värri; S L Himanen; J Hasan; M Lehtokangas; J Saarinen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  Opportunities for utilizing polysomnography signals to characterize obstructive sleep apnea subtypes and severity.

Authors:  Diego R Mazzotti; Diane C Lim; Kate Sutherland; Lia Bittencourt; Jesse W Mindel; Ulysses Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Sample entropy tracks changes in electroencephalogram power spectrum with sleep state and aging.

Authors:  Eugene N Bruce; Margaret C Bruce; Swetha Vennelaganti
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  Sleep microstructure and neurodegeneration as measured by [123I]beta-CIT SPECT in treated patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Svenja Happe; Peter Anderer; Walter Pirker; Gerhard Klösch; Georg Gruber; Bernd Saletu; Josef Zeitlhofer
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Heuristic Optimization of Deep and Shallow Classifiers: An Application for Electroencephalogram Cyclic Alternating Pattern Detection.

Authors:  Fábio Mendonça; Sheikh Shanawaz Mostafa; Diogo Freitas; Fernando Morgado-Dias; Antonio G Ravelo-García
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  Inter-hemispheric oscillations in human sleep.

Authors:  Lukas L Imbach; Esther Werth; Ulf Kallweit; Johannes Sarnthein; Thomas E Scammell; Christian R Baumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Automatic Cyclic Alternating Pattern (CAP) analysis: Local and multi-trace approaches.

Authors:  Maria Paola Tramonti Fantozzi; Ugo Faraguna; Adrien Ugon; Gastone Ciuti; Andrea Pinna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.