Literature DB >> 8858445

Criteria for concept evaluation.

J M Morse1, C Mitcham, J E Hupcey, M C Tasón.   

Abstract

One of the roles of qualitative enquiry is the utilization of qualitative methods for the development, refinement or modification of concepts. Yet, to date, there are no criteria for evaluating the adequacy of a concept. In this paper, the anatomy of a concept is presented, methods of concept analysis critiqued, and criteria for evaluation of the level of maturity of a concept suggested. Evaluation of criteria include assessment of: the definition of the concept, the characteristics of the concept, the conceptual preconditions and outcomes, and the conceptual boundaries. The authors argue that evaluation of a concept must necessarily precede concept development research (using a Wilsonian-derived method, a critical analysis of the literature, or qualitative enquiry) and precede more formal research procedures (such as operationalization or identification of the variables).

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8858445     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.18022.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  17 in total

1.  Objective Versus Self-Reported Adherence to Airway Clearance Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Gabriela R Oates; Irena Stepanikova; Steven M Rowe; Stephanie Gamble; Hector H Gutierrez; William T Harris
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 2.  Service user involvement in mental health care: an evolutionary concept analysis.

Authors:  Samantha L Millar; Mary Chambers; Melanie Giles
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.

Authors:  Claudia Bull; Joshua Byrnes; Ruvini Hettiarachchi; Martin Downes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Concept analysis: prenatal obesity, a psychoneuroimmunology perspective.

Authors:  Sharon L Ruyak; Elizabeth Corwin
Journal:  Nurs Forum       Date:  2013-05-21

5.  Engagement with genetic discrimination: concerns and experiences in the context of Huntington disease.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Elizabeth Penziner; Oksana Suchowersky; Mark Guttman; Jane S Paulsen; Joan L Bottorff; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Biological embedding: evaluation and analysis of an emerging concept for nursing scholarship.

Authors:  Marliese Dion Nist
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Possible links between behavioral and physiological indices of tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion in advanced cancer.

Authors:  Karin Olson; A Robert Turner; Kerry S Courneya; Catherine Field; Godfrey Man; Marilyn Cree; John Hanson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Nursing in Islamic thought: Reflection on application nursing metaparadigm concept: A philosophical inquiry.

Authors:  Nasrollah Alimohammadi; Nasroolah Alimohammadi; Fariba Taleghani; Esa Mohammadi; Reza Akbarian
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-07

9.  Person-centred rehabilitation: what exactly does it mean? Protocol for a scoping review with thematic analysis towards framing the concept and practice of person-centred rehabilitation.

Authors:  Tiago S Jesus; Felicity Bright; Nicola Kayes; Cheryl A Cott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Principle-based concept analysis: Caring in nursing education.

Authors:  Maryam Salehian; Abbas Heydari; Nahid Aghebati; Hossein Karimi Moonaghi; Seyed Reza Mazloom
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.