Literature DB >> 8858351

Hybrid selection as a method of increasing mapping power for radiation hybrids.

H B Jones1.   

Abstract

Radiation hybrids have become a widely used tool for physical mapping. A drawback of the technique is that large numbers of hybrids are required to construct robust, high-resolution maps. The information contained within a panel of radiation hybrids is limited by the frequency of retention of chromosomal fragments from the donor cell line. In almost all experiments to date, the retention frequency has been below the optimal level; therefore, many hybrids are needed to produce high-quality maps. Because of the labor-intensive nature of large-scale mapping projects, it is important to make panels as small as possible. One method that has been adopted is to produce initially a large number of hybrids that are all typed with a few loci. Those hybrids showing satisfactorily high retention are admitted to the final panel and the rest are discarded. In this way, a panel of radiation hybrids with higher than expected retention can be created. Methods for conducting such a selection regime are discussed. To investigate the potential advantages of selecting hybrids based on their retention frequency, simulations were run under a variety of conditions. As expected panels with high retention (40%) provided better mapping resources than panels with lower (20%) retention. Beginning with an initial panel of 200 hybrids, comparisons of a random sample of 100 hybrids and the set of those 100 hybrids showing the highest marker retention demonstrated that selection may not be always the best strategy despite the increase in mean retention it yields. The selection of hybrids containing large numbers of fragments leads to an overestimation of the frequency of radiation-induced breaks. When breaks occur with high frequency (for example, when high radiation doses are used), the selection of hybrids leads to a loss of linkage and hence an inability to order the markers. As such, the merits of screening hybrids depends on both the radiation dose and the desired map resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8858351     DOI: 10.1101/gr.6.8.761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  7 in total

1.  Enhancing radiation hybrid mapping through whole genome amplification.

Authors:  Genesio M Karere; Leslie A Lyons; Lutz Froenicke
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  A radiation hybrid framework map of bovine chromosome 13.

Authors:  J Schläpfer; Y Yang; C Rexroad; J E Womack
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Endosperm tolerance of paternal aneuploidy allows radiation hybrid mapping of the wheat D-genome and a measure of γ ray-induced chromosome breaks.

Authors:  Vijay K Tiwari; Oscar Riera-Lizarazu; Hilary L Gunn; Kasandra Lopez; M Javed Iqbal; Shahryar F Kianian; Jeffrey M Leonard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Construction of whole genome radiation hybrid panels and map of chromosome 5A of wheat using asymmetric somatic hybridization.

Authors:  Chuanen Zhou; Wei Dong; Lu Han; Jiajie Wei; Li Jia; Yang Tan; Daying Zhi; Zeng-Yu Wang; Guangmin Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Radiation hybrid maps of Medaka chromosomes LG 12, 17, and 22.

Authors:  Feng Su; Yumi Osada; Marc Ekker; Mario Chevrette; Atsushi Shimizu; Shuichi Asakawa; Aiko Shiohama; Takashi Sasaki; Nobuyoshi Shimizu; Toshiyuki Yamanaka; Takao Sasado; Hiroshi Mitani; Robert Geisler; Hisato Kondoh; Makoto Furutani-Seiki
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Physical mapping resources for large plant genomes: radiation hybrids for wheat D-genome progenitor Aegilops tauschii.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar; Kristin Simons; Muhammad J Iqbal; Monika Michalak de Jiménez; Filippo M Bassi; Farhad Ghavami; Omar Al-Azzam; Thomas Drader; Yi Wang; Ming-Cheng Luo; Yong Q Gu; Anne Denton; Gerard R Lazo; Steven S Xu; Jan Dvorak; Penny M A Kianian; Shahryar F Kianian
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Construction of two whole genome radiation hybrid panels for dromedary (Camelus dromedarius): 5000RAD and 15000RAD.

Authors:  Polina L Perelman; Rudolf Pichler; Anna Gaggl; Denis M Larkin; Terje Raudsepp; Fahad Alshanbari; Heather M Holl; Samantha A Brooks; Pamela A Burger; Kathiravan Periasamy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.