Literature DB >> 8857868

Treating major depression in primary care practice. Eight-month clinical outcomes.

H C Schulberg1, M R Block, M J Madonia, C P Scott, E Rodriguez, S D Imber, J Perel, J Lave, P R Houck, J L Coulehan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We studied whether standardized treatments of major depression whose efficacy was established with psychiatric patients are equally effective when provided to primary care patients, and whether standardized treatments are more effective than a primary care physician's usual care.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, in which primary care patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for a current major depression were assigned to nortriptyline (n = 91) or interpersonal psychotherapy (n = 93) provided within well-structured parameters, or a physician's usual care (n = 92). The main outcome measures were degree and rate of improvement in severity of depressive symptoms and proportion of patients recovered at 8 months.
RESULTS: Severity of depressive symptoms was reduced more rapidly and more effectively among patients randomized to pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy than among patients assigned to a physician's usual care. Among treatment completers, approximately 70% of patients participating in the full pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy protocol but only 20% of usual care patients were judged as recovered at 8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy effectively treat major depression among primary care patients when provided within specific parameters and for the full acute and continuation phases. Treatment principles recommended by the Depression Guideline Panel of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research are supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8857868     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830100061008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  84 in total

Review 1.  Psychotherapy research: new findings and implications for training and practice.

Authors:  P Høglend
Journal:  J Psychother Pract Res       Date:  1999

2.  Managing depression in primary care.

Authors:  E H Wagner; G E Simon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-31

3.  Naturalistic treatment study of depression in general practice. Clinical management is important in treatment of depression.

Authors:  P L Cornwall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-02

4.  Managing patients with depression: is primary care up to the challenge?

Authors:  D E Ford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Which clinical practice guidelines for depression? An overview for busy practitioners.

Authors:  P L Cornwall; J Scott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Improving outcomes in depression.

Authors:  M Von Korff; D Goldberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-27

7.  A case report: implementing a nurse telecare program for treating depression in primary care.

Authors:  Joel F Meresman; Enid M Hunkeler; William A Hargreaves; Arlene J Kirsch; Patricia Robinson; Ann Green; Elvira Z Mann; Michael Getzell; Paul Feigenbaum
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2003

8.  Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many.

Authors:  M A Whooley; A L Avins; J Miranda; W S Browner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Understanding team-based quality improvement for depression in primary care.

Authors:  Lisa V Rubenstein; Louise E Parker; Lisa S Meredith; Andrea Altschuler; Emmeline dePillis; John Hernandez; Nancy P Gordon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of escitalopram versus venlafaxine XR in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  José-Luis Fernandez; Stuart Montgomery; Clément Francois
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.