Literature DB >> 8857480

Comparison of standard- and extended-length participation in cardiac rehabilitation on body composition, functional capacity, and blood lipids.

P H Brubaker1, J G Warner, W J Rejeski, D G Edwards, B A Matrazzo, P M Ribisl, H S Miller, D M Herrington.   

Abstract

Participation in a standard-length outpatient cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) for 3 months is known to result in positive changes in body composition, functional capacity, and blood lipids in patients with coronary artery disease. However, there has been little attempt to compare patients who remain active in a formal CRP for an extended length of >1 year with patients who exit after a standard length of 3 months. Consequently, 50 patients underwent a series of tests including a maximal graded exercise treadmill test, assessment of body composition, and fasting blood lipid analysis, at entry to CRP and after a follow-up period that ranged from 1 to 5 years. All patients participated in a standard multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation program for 3 months. Twenty-five patients discontinued participation after 3 months and received no other contact from the program staff until follow-up, whereas 25 patients remained active in the program until follow-up. After statistically adjusting for baseline differences between the groups, significant differences were observed between the extended- and standard-length groups at follow-up for body weight (177 vs 183 lbs), percent fat (22% vs 24%), METS (10.5 vs 8.4), high-density lipoprotein level cholesterol (44 vs 39 mg/dl), total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio (5.2 vs 6.1), and triglycerides (134 vs 204 mg/dl), respectively. No significant differences in the adjusted means were observed between the groups at follow-up for total cholesterol (209 vs 219 mg/dl) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (136 vs 138 mg/dl). Data from this study demonstrate the efficacy of extended participation in CRP on body composition, functional capacity, and blood lipids. Greater efforts need to be directed at retaining patients in low-cost, center-based maintenance programs and at extending monitoring of patients exiting standard length CRPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8857480     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00418-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  9 in total

1.  A self-regulation lifestyle program for post-cardiac rehabilitation patients has long-term effects on exercise adherence.

Authors:  Veronica Janssen; Veronique De Gucht; Henk van Exel; Stan Maes
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-01-19

Review 2.  Home versus center based physical activity programs in older adults.

Authors:  N L Ashworth; K E Chad; E L Harrison; B A Reeder; S C Marshall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

Review 3.  The impact of training modalities on the clinical benefits of exercise intervention in patients with cardiovascular disease risk or type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Paul Dendale; Luc J C van Loon; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Rehabilitation in cardiac patients:what do we know about training modalities?

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Paul Dendale; Jan Berger; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  A randomized controlled trial of an extensive lifestyle management intervention (ELMI) following cardiac rehabilitation: study design and baseline data.

Authors:  Scott A Lear; Andrew Ignaszewski; Wolfgang Linden; Anka Brozic; Marla Kiess; John J Spinelli; P Haydn Pritchard; Jiri J Frohlich
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2002-11-12

6.  Clinical and cost-effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared to conventional, centre-based cardiac rehabilitation: Results of the FIT@Home study.

Authors:  Jos J Kraal; M Elske Van den Akker-Van Marle; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Wim Stut; Niels Peek; Hareld Mc Kemps
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 7.804

7.  Predictors of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvements With Cardiac Rehabilitation: Lower Baseline Fitness With the Most to Gain, Gains the Most.

Authors:  Wesley J Tucker; Mark J Haykowsky
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 6.614

8.  Effects of community-based cardiac rehabilitation on body composition and physical function in individuals with stable coronary artery disease: 1.6-year followup.

Authors:  Sandra Mandic; Claire Hodge; Emily Stevens; Robert Walker; Edwin R Nye; Dianne Body; Leanne Barclay; Michael J A Williams
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Effects and costs of home-based training with telemonitoring guidance in low to moderate risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation: The FIT@Home study.

Authors:  Jos J Kraal; Niels Peek; M Elske van den Akker-Van Marle; Hareld M C Kemps
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.298

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.