Literature DB >> 8857196

Health interview surveys. Towards international harmonization of methods and instruments.

A de Bruin1, H S Picavet, A Nossikov.   

Abstract

With the strategy for health for all and its 38 targets, the WHO Regional Office for Europe has created a common health policy for Europe, and has developed internationally agreed indicators for measuring progress towards the attainment of the targets. Some of these indicators are "classical" health indicators, such as mortality rates and the incidence of notifiable diseases, while others reflect more recent public health concerns such as health-related behaviour and quality of life. For the latter group, gathering the information necessary for monitoring and evaluating progress is somewhat haphazard. Health interview surveys provide the best -- in some cases the only -- means of collecting data on many of these indicators, since they mirror the information that only properly approached individuals may be able to provide and ensure that all subgroups of the population are covered. Yet such surveys have enjoyed a long tradition only in a few countries. Moreover, when these indicators are covered, the results are often not comparable. The methods and instruments used to collect data have often been developed without international coordination or adapted from those used in other countries, usually with substantial modification to suit what are perceived to be local requirements. There has also tended to be considerable uncertainty among those countries lacking a tradition of health interviewing as to the best way of conducting surveys. Against this background, the WHO Regional Office and Statistics Netherlands organized a series of consultations, which have resulted in the internationally agreed methods and instruments for health interview surveys set out in this book. These methods and instruments are likely in the longer term to become standards, thus improving comparability of information. This book provides practical guidance on methods for health interview surveys. It is thus essential reading for all concerned in the planning and carrying out of such surveys, whether in national statistical offices or in public or private interviewing agencies. It will also be useful to all in the public health community, including students and academics.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8857196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser        ISSN: 0378-2255


  109 in total

1.  Improving Health Related Quality of Life and Independence in Community Dwelling Frail Older Adults through a Client-Centred and Activity-Oriented Program. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  P De Vriendt; W Peersman; A Florus; M Verbeke; D Van de Velde
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Variance estimation methods for health expectancy by relative socio-economic status.

Authors:  Emmanuel Abatih; Herman Van Oyen; Nathalie Bossuyt; Liesbeth Bruckers
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  The effect of question order on self-rated general health status in a multilingual survey context.

Authors:  Sunghee Lee; David Grant
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The link between past informal payments and willingness of the Hungarian population to pay formal fees for health care services: results from a contingent valuation study.

Authors:  Petra Baji; Milena Pavlova; László Gulácsi; Miklós Farkas; Wim Groot
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-08-30

5.  Are different measures of self-rated health comparable? An assessment in five European countries.

Authors:  Hendrik Jürges; Mauricio Avendano; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  The use of chronic disease risk factor surveillance systems for evidence-based decision-making: physical activity and nutrition as examples.

Authors:  Anne W Taylor; Stefano Campostrini; Tiffany K Gill; Patricia Carter; Eleonora Dal Grande; Michele Herriot
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 7.  The Relationship Between Self-Rated Health and Acculturation in Hispanic and Asian Adult Immigrants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lisa L Lommel; Jyu-Lin Chen
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-04

8.  Comparison of self-rated health in older people of St. Petersburg, Russia, and Tampere, Finland: how sensitive is SRH to cross-cultural factors?

Authors:  Merja Vuorisalmi; Ilkka Pietilä; Pertti Pohjolainen; Marja Jylhä
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2008-09-16

9.  Predictors of mortality of patients newly diagnosed with clinical type 2 diabetes: a 5-year follow up study.

Authors:  Niels de Fine Olivarius; Volkert Siersma; Anni Bs Nielsen; Lars J Hansen; Lotte Rosenvinge; Carl Erik Mogensen
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.763

10.  Effect of a multimodal high intensity exercise intervention in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lis Adamsen; Morten Quist; Christina Andersen; Tom Møller; Jørn Herrstedt; Dorte Kronborg; Marie T Baadsgaard; Kirsten Vistisen; Julie Midtgaard; Birgitte Christiansen; Maria Stage; Morten T Kronborg; Mikael Rørth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.