Literature DB >> 8856977

SOS response as an adaptive response to DNA damage in prokaryotes.

H Shinagawa1.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli possesses an elaborate adaptive mechanism called the "SOS response" to cope with various types of DNA damage. More than 20 SOS genes, most of which are known to be involved in the functions that promote the survival of DNA-damaged cells, are induced by treatments that damage DNA or inhibit DNA synthesis. All the SOS genes share similar sequences in the regulatory regions called the "SOS box", to which LexA repressor binds to repress the transcription in the absence of DNA damage. The SOS signal appears to be the single-stranded DNA produced in vicinity of DNA damage, to which RecA protein binds to be activated as a coprotease. The activated RecA promotes autocleavage of LexA protein by allosteric interaction, which activates the latent serine protease activity of LexA. The induced products of the SOS genes repair DNA lesions by various mechanisms, including recombination, excision repair and error-prone repair, and as the consequence, the SOS signal in the cell decreases and the repression of the SOS genes is restored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8856977     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9088-5_14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EXS        ISSN: 1023-294X


  23 in total

1.  A phylogenomic study of DNA repair genes, proteins, and processes.

Authors:  J A Eisen; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  Historical overview: searching for replication help in all of the rec places.

Authors:  M M Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Self-generated diversity produces "insurance effects" in biofilm communities.

Authors:  Blaise R Boles; Matthew Thoendel; Pradeep K Singh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DNA replication checkpoint promotes G1-S transcription by inactivating the MBF repressor Nrm1.

Authors:  R A M de Bruin; T I Kalashnikova; A Aslanian; J Wohlschlegel; C Chahwan; J R Yates; P Russell; C Wittenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  SSB antagonizes RecX-RecA interaction.

Authors:  Dmitry M Baitin; Marielle C Gruenig; Michael M Cox
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Antibiotics as probes of biological complexity.

Authors:  Shannon B Falconer; Tomasz L Czarny; Eric D Brown
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 7.  Regulation of growth and death in Escherichia coli by toxin-antitoxin systems.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yamaguchi; Masayori Inouye
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  RAD9 and RAD24 define two additive, interacting branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in budding yeast normally required for Rad53 modification and activation.

Authors:  M A de la Torre-Ruiz; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Mechanisms of toxin inhibition and transcriptional repression by Escherichia coli DinJ-YafQ.

Authors:  Ajchareeya Ruangprasert; Tatsuya Maehigashi; Stacey J Miles; Nisha Giridharan; Julie X Liu; Christine M Dunham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Structure of the LexA-DNA complex and implications for SOS box measurement.

Authors:  Adrianna P P Zhang; Ying Z Pigli; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.