Literature DB >> 8856832

Influence of training dose on nicotine discrimination in humans.

K A Perkins1, D D'Amico, M Sanders, J E Grobe, A Wilson, R L Stiller.   

Abstract

Non-human research indicates that drug discrimination results may depend largely on the specific training conditions, including initial training dose. It has recently been shown that humans can discriminate among different doses of nicotine delivered by nasal spray. In this study, we examined the influence of training dose on subsequent behavioral discrimination of a range of nicotine doses. Male (n = 17) and female smokers (n = 16) were randomly assigned to "low" (10 micrograms/kg) versus "high" (30 micrograms/kg) nicotine training dose groups and trained reliably to discriminate this dose from placebo (0) on day 1 (> or = 80% correct identification). All but six subjects (four in low, two in high) learned this discrimination and continued on to day 2, in which both groups received 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 micrograms/kg in ascending order (30 min between dosings) and were tested for generalization with their training dose using quantal and quantitative behavioral discrimination tasks. Subjective responses via traditional self-report measures were also assessed. Nicotine-appropriate responding on day 2 was significantly greater in low- versus high-dose groups, especially at 5 micrograms/kg. However, this difference due to training dose was seen more in women than in men. Discrimination behavior was associated with subjective effects of head rush in males, and with head rush and decline in urge to smoke in females. These results show that discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine are not fixed properties of the drug, but can be influenced by training conditions, and that effects associated with this discrimination may differ between men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8856832     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  24 in total

1.  An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Puffing behavior during the smoking of a single cigarette in a naturalistic environment.

Authors:  S Kolonen; J Tuomisto; P Puustinen; M M Airaksinen
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Reinforcing and subjective effects of diazepam in nondrug-abusing volunteers.

Authors:  H deWit; J Pierri; C E Johanson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 4.  Gender differences in tobacco use.

Authors:  N E Grunberg; S E Winders; M E Wewers
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Improved gas chromatographic method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in biologic fluids.

Authors:  P Jacob; M Wilson; N L Benowitz
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1981-01-02

6.  Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment.

Authors:  K O Fagerström
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Nicotine discrimination in male and female smokers.

Authors:  K A Perkins; A DiMarco; J E Grobe; A Scierka; R L Stiller
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Role of training dose in discrimination of nicotine and related compounds by rats.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; H S Garcha; J A Pratt; R Kumar
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 9.  The scientific case that nicotine is addictive.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; M J Jarvis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Qualitative differences in the discriminative stimulus effects of low and high doses of caffeine in the rat.

Authors:  G K Mumford; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Association of the DRD2 gene Taq1A polymorphism and smoking behavior: a meta-analysis and new data.

Authors:  Marcus R Munafò; Nicholas J Timpson; Sean P David; Shah Ebrahim; Debbie A Lawlor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Nicotine pre-treatment reduces sensitivity to the interoceptive stimulus effects of commonly abused drugs as assessed with taste conditioning paradigms.

Authors:  G C Loney; P J Meyer
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 4.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Human drug discrimination: A primer and methodological review.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Joseph L Alcorn; Anna R Reynolds; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Randomized trial of the effectiveness of combined behavioral/pharmacological smoking cessation treatment in Syrian primary care clinics.

Authors:  Kenneth D Ward; Taghrid Asfar; Radwan Al Ali; Samer Rastam; Mark W Vander Weg; Thomas Eissenberg; Wasim Maziak
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Cigarette abstinence impairs memory and metacognition despite administration of 2 mg nicotine gum.

Authors:  William L Kelemen; Erika K Fulton
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 8.  More than Smoke and Patches: The Quest for Pharmacotherapies to Treat Tobacco Use Disorder.

Authors:  M J Moerke; L R McMahon; J L Wilkerson
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 25.468

9.  A comparison of the nicotine lozenge and nicotine gum: an effectiveness randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Quinn R Pack; Douglas E Jorenby; Michael C Fiore; Thomas Jackson; Patricia Weston; Megan E Piper; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2008-08

10.  Subjective responses to intravenous nicotine: greater sensitivity in women than in men.

Authors:  Mehmet Sofuoglu; Marc Mooney
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.