Literature DB >> 8856214

The equivalent renal urea clearance: a new parameter to assess dialysis dose.

F G Casino1, T Lopez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently the total (dialytic plus renal) urea clearance (KT) is computed as Kt/V plus the equivalent Kt/V (KT/VKR) provided by the renal urea clearance (KR). However, KT/VKR is computed with two different formulae, by Gotch and Keshaviah respectively. Moreover Teschan suggested a weekly KT, that is a multiple of Keshaviah's KT. We suggest the equivalent renal urea clearance (EKR), that kinetically quantifies the "time-averaged KT' and is independent of treatment type and schedule.
METHODS: Computer simulation has been used to analyse the relationship between EKR, as corrected for urea volume (EKRc), and Kt/V. Data from 66 HD patients, of whom eight were on once-weekly and 11 on twice-weekly HD, had been used to compare EKR with current KTs.
RESULTS: For each individual schedule, the relationship between EKRc and Kt/V is linear and each ml/min of KR increases EKR by the same amount. For instance, for thrice-weekly HD patients, EKRc = 1 + 10 x Kt/V: so that, the critical Kt/V values of 0.8 and 1.0 correspond to EKRc values of 9.0 and 11 ml/min respectively, independently from treatment type and schedule. As to the clinical data, all once- and twice-weekly patients had a significant KR and excellent clinical status, but most of them had 9 < or = EKRc < 11 ml/min. After appropriate reconciliation of units, it has been found that kinetic KT was overestimated by about 10-12% (range, 2-23%) by Keshaviah and Teschan's KT, and by about 2-7% (range, 0.3-15%) by Gotch's KT.
CONCLUSIONS: EKRc can account for KR and provide guidelines for all types of dialysis treatments: as far as urea is concerned, dialysis adequacy should require EKRc > or = 11 ml/min. However, it is likely that EKRc > or = 9 ml/min could suffice for patients with a substantial residual renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8856214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  19 in total

Review 1.  Dosing of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Anitha Vijayan; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Dialysis cannot be dosed.

Authors:  Timothy W Meyer; Tammy L Sirich; Thomas H Hostetter
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Is incremental hemodialysis ready to return on the scene? From empiricism to kinetic modelling.

Authors:  Carlo Basile; Francesco Gaetano Casino; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.902

4.  Toward the optimal dose metric in continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Rolando Claure-Del Granado; Etienne Macedo; Glenn M Chertow; Sharon Soroko; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.595

5.  Design of the VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) Study: intensive versus conventional renal support in acute renal failure.

Authors:  Paul M Palevsky; Theresa O'Connor; Jane Hongyuan Zhang; Robert A Star; Mark W Smith
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 6.  Incremental hemodialysis, a valuable option for the frail elderly patient.

Authors:  Carlo Basile; Francesco Gaetano Casino; Filippo Aucella
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 3.902

7.  Dialysis adequacy indices and body composition in male and female patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Malgorzata Debowska; Ramón Paniagua; María-de-Jesús Ventura; Marcela Ávila-Díaz; Carmen Prado-Uribe; Carmen Mora; Elvia García-López; Abdul Rashid Qureshi; Bengt Lindholm; Jacek Waniewski
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Effect of Low-Sodium versus Conventional Sodium Dialysate on Left Ventricular Mass in Home and Self-Care Satellite Facility Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mark R Marshall; Alain C Vandal; Janak R de Zoysa; Ruvin S Gabriel; Imad A Haloob; Christopher J Hood; John H Irvine; Philip J Matheson; David O R McGregor; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; John B W Schollum; David J Semple; Zhengxiu Xie; Tian Min Ma; Rose Sisk; Joanna L Dunlop
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Delivered dose of renal replacement therapy and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Sergio Vesconi; Dinna N Cruz; Roberto Fumagalli; Detlef Kindgen-Milles; Gianpaola Monti; Anibal Marinho; Filippo Mariano; Marco Formica; Mariano Marchesi; Robert René; Sergio Livigni; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Intensity of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: perspective from within the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study.

Authors:  Paul M Palevsky; Theresa Z O'Connor; Glenn M Chertow; Susan T Crowley; Jane Hongyuan Zhang; John A Kellum
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.