Literature DB >> 8855490

Extraperitonealization of the anastomosis and sacral drain in restorative surgery for rectal carcinoma: a safety mechanism in the absence of a covering stoma.

G R Jatzko1, P H Lisborg, V M Wette.   

Abstract

A retrospective 10-year study was conducted on 473 patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery, to evaluate a surgical procedure which has been generally abandoned, but which we believe has a significant potential to reduce the incidence of the severe and often fatal complications caused by anastomotic breakdown following low anterior resection, especially when a covering stoma is absent. This procedure involves separating the anastomosis and sacral drain from the abdominal cavity by suturing the parietal peritoneum to the colon and mesocolon, and placing the sacral drain outside the peritoneal cavity, whereby contamination of the abdominal cavity is avoided should anastomostic leakage occur. Sphincter preservation was possible in 343 patients (72.5%) while 116 (24.5%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR). Of 331 patients who underwent sphincter-saving resection (SSR), 31 (9.4%) had primary protective colostomies. Radical RO-resection according to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) was performed in 405 patients, and 65 (19.6%) underwent extended resections. Anastomotic leakage became clinically manifest in 33 patients (10%; or 11% when those with primary colostomies were excluded). Only 1 patient required relaparotomy while 32 were successfully treated with temporary loop colostomy in the right epigastrium. No deaths occurred following anastomotic leakage breakdown. Overall operative hospital mortality was 3.0%; 2.7% and 2.6% in the SSR and APR groups, respectively. The adjusted 5-year survival rates were 60% for APR and 72% for SSR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8855490     DOI: 10.1007/bf00311662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  34 in total

Review 1.  [Deep resection of the rectum--transabdominal approach].

Authors:  F P Gall
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Treatment of anastomotic leakage following low anterior colon resection.

Authors:  W J Mileski; R J Joehl; R V Rege; D L Nahrwold
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-08

3.  Causes and prevention of colonic anastomotic breakdown.

Authors:  P R Hawley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1973 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Study of healing of inverting and everting intestinal anastomoses.

Authors:  F Canalis; M M Ravitch
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1968-01

5.  Omental protection of intestinal anastomoses.

Authors:  A D McLachlin; D W Denton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  A prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  J Hoffmann; M H Shokouh-Amiri; P Damm; R Jensen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Single layer anastomosis in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  N A Matheson; A D Irving
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1976-10

8.  Drainage of the abdomen.

Authors:  H L Duthie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1972-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The effect of surgical drainage materials on colonic healing.

Authors:  S R Smith; J C Connolly; P W Crane; O J Gilmore
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Closure of colostomy--a safe procedure?

Authors:  M H Wheeler; J Barker
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction.

Authors:  Panagiotis Taflampas; Manousos Christodoulakis; Dimitrios D Tsiftsis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Authors:  C Eckmann; P Kujath; T H K Schiedeck; H Shekarriz; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.