Literature DB >> 8854883

Structural differences between XX and ZW sex lampbrush chromosomes in Rana rugosa females (Anura: Ranidae).

I Miura1, H Ohtani, A Kashiwagi, H Hanada, M Nakamura.   

Abstract

In this study we investigated the morphology and pairing behavior of sex lampbrush chromosomes of XX and ZW females of Rana rugosa from five localities in Japan. Whereas lampbrush chromosomes of XX females from Hiroshima and Isehara had subterminally located centromeres and showed remarkable similarity, those of XX females from Hamakita had the centromeres in the middle. Analysis of landmark configurations revealed that chromosome Xq of Hamakita females closely resembled a part of Xq of Hiroshima and Isehara females, whereas Xp of Hamakita females was inverted compared with the other part of Xq of Hiroshima and Isehara females. Z chromosomes from Kanazawa and Niigata closely resembled the Hiroshima X, whereas the W closely resembled the Hamakita X. XX pairings from Hiroshima, Isehara, and Hamakita were found to be joined by one to four chiasmata at various points all along the axis in both the short and long arms, whereas chromosomal pairs from Kanazawa and Niigata showed only one chiasma between Zp and the distal region of Wq. From these findings we conclude that (1) both the W and the Hamakita X must have evolved from the more primitive Hiroshima and Isehara X chromosomes by a series of pericentric inversions; and (2) females distributed in Hamakita possess two X chromosomes similar to the W, suggesting that either sex-determining or sex-modifying genes on the Hamakita X are clearly different from those on the Kanazawa and Niigata W chromosome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8854883     DOI: 10.1007/bf02528772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  4 in total

1.  Lampbrush W and Z heterochromosome characterization with a monoclonal antibody and heat-induced chromosomal markers in the newt Pleurodeles waltl: W chromosome plays a role in female sex determination.

Authors:  J C Lacroix; R Azzouz; F Simon; M Bellini; J Charlemagne; C Dournon
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Genetics of Platypoecilus Maculatus. IV. the Sex Determining Mechanism in Two Wild Populations of the Mexican Platyfish.

Authors:  M Gordon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1947-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Early stages of sex chromosome differentiation in fish as analysed by simple repetitive DNA sequences.

Authors:  I Nanda; M Schartl; W Feichtinger; J T Epplen; M Schmid
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Changes in the heterogametic mechanism of sex determination.

Authors:  J J Bull; E L Charnov
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 3.821

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Change of the heterogametic sex from male to female in the frog.

Authors:  M Ogata; H Ohtani; T Igarashi; Y Hasegawa; Y Ichikawa; I Miura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evidence for heteromorphic sex chromosomes in males of Rana tagoi and Rana sakuraii in Nishitama district of Tokyo (Anura: Ranidae).

Authors:  M Ryuzaki; H Hanada; H Okumoto; N Takizawa; M Nishioka
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Cytological evidence for population-specific sex chromosome heteromorphism in Palaearctic green toads (Amphibia, Anura).

Authors:  G Odierna; G Aprea; T Capriglione; S Castellano; E Balletto
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Effects of dibutyl phthalate as an environmental endocrine disruptor on gonadal sex differentiation of genetic males of the frog Rana rugosa.

Authors:  H Ohtani; I Miura; Y Ichikawa
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Comparative chromosome mapping of sex-linked genes and identification of sex chromosomal rearrangements in the Japanese wrinkled frog (Rana rugosa, Ranidae) with ZW and XY sex chromosome systems.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Uno; Chizuko Nishida; Yuki Oshima; Satoshi Yokoyama; Ikuo Miura; Yoichi Matsuda; Masahisa Nakamura
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.620

Review 6.  Amphibian and Avian Karyotype Evolution: Insights from Lampbrush Chromosome Studies.

Authors:  Anna Zlotina; Dmitry Dedukh; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.