Literature DB >> 8854328

Variability of precordial electrode placement during routine electrocardiography.

W Wenger1, P Kligfield.   

Abstract

Placement of precordial electrodes by 30 experienced technicians during routine electrocardiography was compared with anatomically ascertained sites marked by ink visible only under ultraviolet "black light" in three men and five women. The distance and direction from each marked site to the center of the applied electrode was measured to allow calculation of both the linear magnitude of difference (derived from the square root of the sum of the squares of rise and run) and also the direction of difference (in quadrants) between the anatomically established location and the electrode at each precordial site. The average difference from the applied electrodes to the corresponding marked sites was 1.14 inches, ranging from a mean of 1.31 inches at lead V1 to 0.98 inches at lead V4. Overall, 64% of precordial electrodes were placed within a radius of 1.25 inch, ranging from 56% for lead V6 to 74% for lead V4, and 27% of precordial electrodes were placed within a radius of 0.625 inch. There was superior quadrant displacement of more than 0.625 inch in more than 50% of routine applications of leads V1 and V2, indicating that these electrodes are commonly placed both high and wide of their anatomically defined precordial sites. Similarly, there was an inferior and left-ward displacement of more than 0.625 inch in 30-50% leads of routine applications of V4 through V6, indicating that these lateral precordial electrodes are commonly placed both low and wide of their respective anatomic sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8854328     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0736(96)80080-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  10 in total

Review 1.  Technical mistakes during the acquisition of the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Javier García-Niebla; Pablo Llontop-García; Juan Ignacio Valle-Racero; Guillem Serra-Autonell; Velislav N Batchvarov; Antonio Bayés de Luna
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Significance of a negative sinus P wave in lead V2 of the clinical electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Rex N MacAlpin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Main artifacts in electrocardiography.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz Carlos de Abreu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Correlation between electrocardiographic features and mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Nestor Rodrigues de Oliveira Neto; George Cobe Fonseca; Gustavo Gomes Torres; Marcos Antonio Pinheiro; George Barreto Miranda
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Left-ventricular mechanical activation and aortic-arch orientation recovered from magneto-hydrodynamic voltages observed in 12-lead ECGs obtained inside MRIs: a feasibility study.

Authors:  T Stan Gregory; Ehud J Schmidt; Shelley Hualei Zhang; Raymond Y Kwong; William G Stevenson; Jonathan R Murrow; Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Telemedicine supported by Augmented Reality: an interactive guide for untrained people in performing an ECG test.

Authors:  Paolo Bifulco; Fabio Narducci; Raffaele Vertucci; Pasquale Ambruosi; Mario Cesarelli; Maria Romano
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  A Novel 12-Lead Electrocardiographic System for Home Use: Development and Usability Testing.

Authors:  Annemarijn Sm Steijlen; Kaspar Mb Jansen; Armagan Albayrak; Derk O Verschure; Diederik F Van Wijk
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Chest-lead ST-J amplitudes using arm electrodes as reference instead of the Wilson central terminal in smartphone ECG applications: Influence on ST-elevation myocardial infarction criteria fulfillment.

Authors:  Thomas Lindow; Henrik Engblom; Ardavan Khoshnood; Ulf Ekelund; Marcus Carlsson; Olle Pahlm
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Computational design and optimization of electro-physiological sensors.

Authors:  Aditya Shekhar Nittala; Andreas Karrenbauer; Arshad Khan; Tobias Kraus; Jürgen Steimle
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Accuracy of ECG chest electrode placements by paramedics: an observational study.

Authors:  Pete Gregory; Tim Kilner; Stephen Lodge; Suzy Paget
Journal:  Br Paramed J       Date:  2021-05-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.