Literature DB >> 8854317

The effect of variable size posterior wall acetabular fractures on contact characteristics of the hip joint.

S A Olson1, B K Bay, A N Pollak, N A Sharkey, T Lee.   

Abstract

The indications for open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures associated with a clinically stable hip joint are unclear. In previous work a large posterior wall defect (27% articular surface area) resulted in significant alteration of load transmission across the hip; specifically, there was a transition from evenly distributed loading along the acetabular articular surface to loading concentrated mainly in the superior portion of the articular surface during simulated single leg stance. However, the majority of posterior wall fractures involve a smaller amount of the articular surface. Posterior wall acetabular fractures not associated with instability of the hip are commonly treated nonoperatively. This practice does not account for the size of the posterior wall fracture. To study the biomechanical consequences of variably sized articular defects, a laboratory experiment was conducted evaluating three progressively larger posterior wall defects of the acetabulum during simulated single leg stance using superlow Fuji prescale film (Itochu International, New York): (a) 1/3 articular surface width through a 50 degrees arc along the posterior wall of the acetabulum, (b) 2/3, and (c) 3/3 articular width defects through the same 50 degrees arc along the posterior wall of the acetabulum. In the intact acetabulum, 48% of the total articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum. Twenty-eight percent of articular contact was in the anterior wall region of the acetabulum and 24% in the posterior wall region. After the 1/3 width posterior wall defect, 64% of the articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum (p = 0.0011). The 2/3 width posterior wall defect resulted in 71% of articular contact area being located in the superior acetabulum (p = 0.0006). After the 3/3 width posterior wall defect, 77% of articular contact was located in the superior acetabulum, significantly greater than the intact condition (p < 0.0001) and 1/3 width defect (p = 0.0222). The total absolute contact areas for all defect conditions were significantly less than the intact conditions. The results of this study reconfirm the observation that posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum significantly alter the articular contact characteristics in the hip during single leg stance. The relationship between defect size and changes in joint contact showed that the smallest defect resulted in the greatest alteration in joint contact areas, whereas larger defects resulted in minor increments of change in contact area. This finding is of concern because the clinical practice of managing acetabular fractures nonoperatively if the hip joint is stable is based on the supposition that the joint retains enough integrity to function without undue risk of late posttraumatic osteoarthritis. A better understanding of the natural history of stable posterior wall acetabular fractures is needed to ascertain whether some of these fractures merit operative repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8854317     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199608000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  16 in total

1.  Classifications in brief: Letournel classification for acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Timothy B Alton; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A biomechanical comparison of different fixation techniques for fractures of the acetabular posterior wall.

Authors:  Xinbao Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Acetabular fractures following rugby tackles: a case series.

Authors:  Daniel W Good; Michael Leonard; Darren Lui; Seamus Morris; John P McElwain
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-10-05

Review 4.  [Biomechanical principles for treatment of osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis].

Authors:  A Gänsslen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  [Internal fixation of acetabular posterior wall fractures].

Authors:  Axel Gänsslen; Björn Steinke; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Outcome of unstable isolated fractures of the posterior acetabular wall associated with hip dislocation.

Authors:  L de Palma; A Santucci; A Verdenelli; M G Bugatti; L Meco; M Marinelli
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-07

7.  Finite element analysis of the stability of combined plate internal fixation in posterior wall fractures of acetabulum.

Authors:  Xi-Ming Liu; Chang-Wu Pan; Guo-Dong Wang; Xian-Hua Cai; Lei Chen; Cheng-Fei Meng; Jin-Cheng Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

8.  Tomographic index as auxiliary criteria for surgery indication in fracture dislocation of acetabulum posterior wall.

Authors:  Edison N Fujiki; Eduardo N Yamaguchi; Edison Miachiro; Takechi Chikude; Roberto Y Ikemoto; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Vitor E Valenti; Luciano M R Rodrigues; Carlos B Monteiro; Carlo Milani
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2012-06-20

9.  Cartilage contact pressure elevations in dysplastic hips: a chronic overload model.

Authors:  Mary E Russell; Kiran H Shivanna; Nicole M Grosland; Douglas R Pedersen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  The Influence of Pelvic Ramus Fracture on the Stability of Fixed Pelvic Complex Fracture.

Authors:  Jianyin Lei; Yue Zhang; Guiying Wu; Zhihua Wang; Xianhua Cai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.