Literature DB >> 8854271

Large vertebral body, in addition to narrow spinal canal, are risk factors for cervical myelopathy.

S Hukuda1, L F Xiang, S Imai, A Katsuura, T Imanaka.   

Abstract

It is well known that a narrow spinal canal is frequently associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. However, few investigators have studied the relationship between the size of the cervical spinal canal and that of the cervical spinal cord. Moreover, no studies mention the correlation between the size of the vertebral body and that of the spinal canal in the pathogenesis of cervical myelopathy. In the present study, we used computed tomographic myelography to measure the size of the vertebral body, spinal canal, and spinal cord in patients who had classic cervical myelopathy and in control subjects. We found that patients with cervical spondylotic had a narrow spinal canal as well as a slender spinal cord in the cervical region. Moreover, the vertebral body is significantly larger in the myelopathy group than in controls. A large vertebral body is thought to be associated with a large osteophyte and large disc protrusion. We conclude that a large vertebral body is another risk factor for cervical myelopathy, along with a narrow spinal canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8854271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  9 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for development of myelopathy in patients with cervical spondylotic cord compression.

Authors:  Shunji Matsunaga; Setsuro Komiya; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Risk factors in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Sudhir Singh; Dharmendra Kumar; Sanjeev Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-08-13

3.  Body conformation in Great Danes with and without clinical signs of cervical spondylomyelopathy.

Authors:  P Martin-Vaquero; R C da Costa
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy.

Authors:  Hans-Ekkehart Vitzthum; Kristina Dalitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Is the radiographic subsidence of stand-alone cages associated with adverse clinical outcomes after cervical spine fusion? An observational cohort study with 2-year follow-up outcome scoring.

Authors:  Dirk Zajonz; Anne-Catherine Franke; Nicolas von der Höh; Anna Voelker; Michael Moche; Jens Gulow; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-11-07

6.  Pavlov's Ratio of the Cervical Spine in a Korean Population: A Comparative Study by Age in Patients with Minor Trauma without Neurologic Symptoms.

Authors:  Myung-Sang Moon; Won Rak Choi; Hyeon Gyu Lim; Sang-Yup Lee; Seung Myung Wi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-01-11

7.  Reevaluation of the Pavlov ratio in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Kyung-Soo Suk; Ki-Tack Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Sang-Hun Lee; Jin-Soo Kim; Jin-Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-02-06

8.  Risk factors for development of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Anoushka Singh; Lindsay Tetreault; Michael G Fehlings; Dena J Fischer; Andrea C Skelly
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-08

9.  Relationship between the small cervical vertebral body and the morbidity of cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Ye Tian; Shu-Jie Wang; Ji-Liang Zhai; Qian-Yu Zhuang; Si-Yi Cai; Jun Qian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.