BACKGROUND: Chlorpromazine has been widely used by anesthesiologists to take advantage of its anesthesia-potentiating and vasorelaxing actions. However, the mechanisms of vasorelaxation induced by chlorpromazine are still not fully understood. METHODS: Using front-surface fluorometry of fura-2 and porcine pulmonary arterial strips, we investigated the effects of chlorpromazine on the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and force of vascular smooth muscle. The affinities of chlorpromazine and other neuroleptics to vascular alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors were then determined by a radio-ligand binding study. RESULTS: Chlorpromazine (as much as 1 microM) inhibited both the elevation of [Ca2+]i and force in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle induced by 80 mM K+-depolarization and 1 microM norepinephrine in a concentration-dependent manner. The extent of inhibition by chlorpromazine in norepinephrine-induced contraction was much greater than that in 80 mM K+-induced contraction. In contrast, as much as 1 microM chlorpromazine had no effect on the increases in [Ca2+]i or force induced by U46619, a thromboxane A2 analogue. Chlorpromazine also had no effect on the intracellular Ca2+ release induced by U46619. In a radio-ligand displacement study, chlorpromazine, haloperidol, phentolamine, trifluoperazine, and imipramine inhibited the specific binding of [3H]prazosin to the porcine aortic membranes, in this order of potency. CONCLUSIONS: Chlorpromazine induces vasorelaxation through an alpha-adrenergic blocking action as well as a calcium antagonistic action; the former action may, therefore, play a major role in chlorpromazine-induced vasorelaxation.
BACKGROUND:Chlorpromazine has been widely used by anesthesiologists to take advantage of its anesthesia-potentiating and vasorelaxing actions. However, the mechanisms of vasorelaxation induced by chlorpromazine are still not fully understood. METHODS: Using front-surface fluorometry of fura-2 and porcine pulmonary arterial strips, we investigated the effects of chlorpromazine on the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) and force of vascular smooth muscle. The affinities of chlorpromazine and other neuroleptics to vascular alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors were then determined by a radio-ligand binding study. RESULTS:Chlorpromazine (as much as 1 microM) inhibited both the elevation of [Ca2+]i and force in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle induced by 80 mM K+-depolarization and 1 microM norepinephrine in a concentration-dependent manner. The extent of inhibition by chlorpromazine in norepinephrine-induced contraction was much greater than that in 80 mM K+-induced contraction. In contrast, as much as 1 microM chlorpromazine had no effect on the increases in [Ca2+]i or force induced by U46619, a thromboxane A2 analogue. Chlorpromazine also had no effect on the intracellular Ca2+ release induced by U46619. In a radio-ligand displacement study, chlorpromazine, haloperidol, phentolamine, trifluoperazine, and imipramine inhibited the specific binding of [3H]prazosin to the porcine aortic membranes, in this order of potency. CONCLUSIONS:Chlorpromazine induces vasorelaxation through an alpha-adrenergic blocking action as well as a calcium antagonistic action; the former action may, therefore, play a major role in chlorpromazine-induced vasorelaxation.