Literature DB >> 8851777

Effects of instruction type and boredom proneness in vigilance: implications for boredom and workload.

D A Sawin1, M W Scerbo.   

Abstract

The present study examined the effects of instruction type and boredom proneness (BP) on vigilance performance, workload, and boredom. Subjects completed the Boredom Proneness Scale and were assigned to high and low groups based on their scores. They then monitored a VDT for critical signals. Half the subjects were instructed to detect "critical" flickers (detection emphasis), and the remaining subjects were instructed to relax but to respond to any flickers observed (relaxation emphasis). Subjects also provided pre- and postvigil ratings of workload, stress, and boredom. A performance decrement was observed for all conditions. Low-BP subjects outperformed high-BP subjects and reported less boredom. Thus the results from the present study provide evidence for the long-sought, elusive link between trait boredom and performance in vigilance. In addition, subjects who received relaxation-emphasis instructions reported lower workload, frustration, and stress for the vigil than did those receiving detection-emphasis instructions. These results are discussed in terms of a recent dynamic model of stress as it relates to sustained attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8851777     DOI: 10.1518/001872095778995616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  4 in total

1.  Applying human factors principles to alert design increases efficiency and reduces prescribing errors in a scenario-based simulation.

Authors:  Alissa L Russ; Alan J Zillich; Brittany L Melton; Scott A Russell; Siying Chen; Jeffrey R Spina; Michael Weiner; Elizabette G Johnson; Joanne K Daggy; M Sue McManus; Jason M Hawsey; Anthony G Puleo; Bradley N Doebbeling; Jason J Saleem
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Does state boredom cause failures of attention? Examining the relations between trait boredom, state boredom, and sustained attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hunter; John D Eastwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Do multidisciplinary cancer care teams suffer decision-making fatigue: an observational, longitudinal team improvement study.

Authors:  James S A Green; Nick Sevdalis; Tayana Soukup; Tasha A K Gandamihardja; Sue McInerney
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Boredom in the COVID-19 pandemic: Trait boredom proneness, the desire to act, and rule-breaking.

Authors:  James Boylan; Paul Seli; Abigail A Scholer; James Danckert
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2020-11-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.