Literature DB >> 8849764

Monitoring the performance of breast screening programmes: use of indirect standardisation in evaluating the invasive cancer detection rate.

R G Blanks1, N E Day, S M Moss.   

Abstract

Close monitoring of data from individual programmes is required to evaluate the potential of the breast screening programme to reach the Health of the Nation target of 25% reduction in breast cancer mortality in the invited age group by the year 2000. This paper outlines the use of indirect age standardisation techniques to compare the performance of individual programmes in terms of their invasive cancer detection rates. Expected invasive cancer detection rates are calculated by applying data from the Swedish two county study to estimated England and Wales background incidence rates for different age strata. If the national programme overall meets these targets then the required mortality reduction should be achieved. The same method can be used by other (national) screening programmes by applying the relevant background incidence figures to produce internationally comparable data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8849764     DOI: 10.1177/096914139600300206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  8 in total

1.  Maximising benefit and minimising harm of screening.

Authors:  J A M Gray; J Patnick; R G Blanks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-01

2.  An analysis of 11.3 million screening tests examining the association between recall and cancer detection rates in the English NHS breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  R G Blanks; R M Given-Wilson; S L Cohen; J Patnick; R J Alison; M G Wallis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Calculating appropriate target cancer detection rates and expected interval cancer rates for the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme. Interval Cancer Working Group.

Authors:  S Moss; R Blanks
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Two view mammography at incident screens: cost effectiveness analysis of policy options.

Authors:  K Johnston; J Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-23

5.  Measures of benefit for breast screening from the pathology database for Scotland, 1991-2001.

Authors:  T J Anderson; C Davis; F E Alexander; H M Dobson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Interval cancers in the NHS breast cancer screening programme in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Authors:  R L Bennett; S J Sellars; S M Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Effectiveness of a small breast screening programme: 25 year evaluation (25 year breast screening evaluation).

Authors:  Andrew Patric Nisbet; Andrew Borthwick-Clarke; Nic Scott; Helen Goulding; Harwood Jane
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-07-13

8.  Addressing the challenge of assessing physician-level screening performance: mammography as an example.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Yunzhi Lin; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; Perry J Pickhardt; Yirong Wu; Roberta M Strigel; Mai A Elezaby; Eve A Kerr; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.