Literature DB >> 8849263

Pharmacokinetic interaction between cefdinir and two angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in rats.

A Jacolot1, M Tod, O Petitjean.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic interaction between cefdinir and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril or quinapril) was investigated in rats. The linearity of cefdinir pharmacokinetics was demonstrated in three groups of rats receiving 10, 20, or 40 mg of cefdinir per kg of body weight intravenously. Then, three other groups of rats were established as follows: group 1 (n = 5) received cefdinir (10 mg/kg) intravenously, and 12 blood samples per rat were drawn between 0 and 8 h after injection of the dose; group 2 (n = 5) was treated in the same way as group 1, but captopril (0.8 mg/kg) was coadministered by intraintestinal injection into all animals; group 3 (n = 6) was treated in the same way as group 2, but quinapril (0.8 mg/kg) replaced captopril. Plasma cefdinir concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography, and the data were analyzed by a noncompartmental method. Finally, three groups of four or five rats each were set up as described above, but the cefdinir dose was 20 mg/kg and the animals were sacrificed 1 h after drug injection to collect blood to determine the unbound cefdinir fraction (fu) by ultrafiltration. The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors increased the mean cefdinir area under the concentration-time curve up to 8 h by a factor of 1.8 (captopril; P < 0.05) and a factor of 3.5 (quinapril; P < 0.05). With captopril, mean cefdinir clearance was decreased by a factor of 2, and the volume of distribution increased by the same factor, while the fu increased from 15.4% +/- 3.0% (cefdinir alone) to 22.8% +/- 10.9% (cefdinir plus captopril). Captopril increased the cefdinir half-life from 0.62 +/- 0.17 to 2.92 +/- 0.95 h. With quinapril, the interaction was so strong that no elimination phase was detectable in four of the six rats, and therefore, no pharmacokinetic parameter values other than the cefdinir fu could be calculated; the cefdinir fu increased to 25.1% +/- 11.1%. It is concluded that captopril and quinapril (and/or their metabolites) have a major impact on the disposition of cefdinir in rats, probably by competition at the plasma protein-binding level and at the tubular anionic carrier level. This latter mechanism should also be relevant in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8849263      PMCID: PMC163242     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  10 in total

Review 1.  Saturable pharmacokinetics in the renal excretion of drugs.

Authors:  C A van Ginneken; F G Russel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Differential renal handling of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors enalaprilat and lisinopril in rats.

Authors:  J H Lin; I W Chen; E H Ulm; D E Duggan
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.922

3.  Saturation of the tubular excretion of beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  J W Bins; H Mattie
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Ultrafiltration vs equilibrium dialysis for determination of free fraction.

Authors:  W F Bowers; S Fulton; J Thompson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Absorption and bioavailability of captopril in mice and rats after administration by gavage and in the diet.

Authors:  S M Singhvi; K J Kripalani; A V Dean; G R Keim; J S Kulesza; F S Meeker; J J Ross; J M Shaw; B H Migdalof
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  Quinapril. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  A N Wadworth; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Quinapril--a preclinical review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology.

Authors:  H R Kaplan; D G Taylor; S C Olson; L K Andrews
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of captopril, enalapril, and quinapril.

Authors:  V Vertes; R Haynie
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-04-02       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Effect of probenecid on the disposition of captopril and captopril dimer in the rat.

Authors:  O H Drummer; J Thompson; R Hooper; B Jarrott
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1985-09-15       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  Pharmacokinetics of FK482, a new orally active cephalosporin, in animals.

Authors:  H Sakamoto; T Hirose; S Nakamoto; K Hatano; F Shibayama; H Kikuchi; Y Mine; S Kuwahara
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.649

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Analysis of the pharmacokinetic interaction between cephalexin and quinapril by a nonlinear mixed-effect model.

Authors:  C Padoin; M Tod; G Perret; O Petitjean
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Competitive inhibition of p-aminohippurate transport by quinapril in rabbit renal basolateral membrane vesicles.

Authors:  W Akarawut; D E Smith
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-06

3.  Effects of organic anion, organic cation, and dipeptide transport inhibitors on cefdinir in the isolated perfused rat kidney.

Authors:  Christopher S Lepsy; Robert J Guttendorf; Alan R Kugler; David E Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Cefdinir: a review of its use in the management of mild-to-moderate bacterial infections.

Authors:  Caroline M Perry; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.