Literature DB >> 8848476

NPY stimulation of food intake in Siberian hamsters is not photoperiod dependent.

K A Boss-Williams1, T J Bartness.   

Abstract

Siberian hamsters (phodopus sungorus sungorus) show naturally occurring seasonal cycles of food intake that are triggered by changes in the photoperiod. In long "summer-like" days (LD) food intake is at its peak, whereas in short "winter-like" days (SD) food intake reaches a nadir. Although the mechanisms underlying these changes in food intake are unknown, results from previous studies suggest that the ability to stimulate or inhibit food intake in Siberian hamsters complements the naturally occurring food intake cycle. Thus, inhibitors of food intake are more effective in SDs, whereas stimulators of food intake are more effective in LDs. A stimulator of food intake in a wide variety of species is neuropeptide Y (NPY). Therefore, we explored the ability of NPY to stimulate food intake in Siberian hamsters. In addition, we tested whether the efficacy of NPY to stimulate food intake was photoperiod dependent. In Experiment 1, LD-housed adult male hamsters were given a series of NPY doses (0.078-10.0 micrograms) intracerebroventricularly (ICV) into the third ventricle and food intake was measured 30 min, 1, 2, and 4 h postinjection. NPY was a potent stimulator of food intake with the 7.5 micrograms dose of NPY producing the greatest increase at 30 min. In Experiment 2, adult male hamsters were housed in LDs or SDs and were given various doses of NPY ranging from 0.039-7.5 micrograms. NPY given ICV stimulated food intake to the same degree in LDs as in SDs with the greatest increases in food intake occurring in the hamsters receiving the 2.5 and 5.0 micrograms dose of NPY. In addition, Siberian hamsters were very sensitive to NPY with the lowest effective dose (0.0585 microgram) that stimulated food intake being six times smaller than in other rodents tested. Collectively, these results showed that Siberian hamsters were more sensitive to the stimulatory effect of NPY on food intake than any other species, but that the ability of NPY to stimulate feeding was not photoperiod dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8848476     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02037-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

Review 1.  Endocrine mechanisms of seasonal adaptation in small mammals: from early results to present understanding.

Authors:  Frank Scherbarth; Stephan Steinlechner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Dynamic modification of hoarding in response to hoard size manipulation.

Authors:  John T Garretson; Timothy J Bartness
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-01-09

Review 3.  Neural and hormonal control of food hoarding.

Authors:  Timothy J Bartness; E Keen-Rhinehart; M J Dailey; B J Teubner
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Cholecystokinin-33 acutely attenuates food foraging, hoarding and intake in Siberian hamsters.

Authors:  Brett J W Teubner; Timothy J Bartness
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 5.  Physiological mechanisms for food-hoarding motivation in animals.

Authors:  Erin Keen-Rhinehart; Megan J Dailey; Timothy Bartness
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Photoperiodic regulation of the orexigenic effects of ghrelin in Siberian hamsters.

Authors:  Sean P Bradley; Lucia M Pattullo; Priyesh N Patel; Brian J Prendergast
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  PYY(3-36) into the arcuate nucleus inhibits food deprivation-induced increases in food hoarding and intake.

Authors:  Brett J W Teubner; Timothy J Bartness
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.750

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.