Literature DB >> 8847879

Rate-dependent effects of the class III antiarrhythmic drug almokalant on refractoriness in the pig.

A C Wiesfeld1, C D De Langen, H J Crijns, K J Bel, H L Hillege, H Wesseling, K I Lie.   

Abstract

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenously administered almokalant, a new class III antiarrhythmic drug, in 7 isoflurane-anesthetized pigs after low and high dose were investigated. Low-dose almokalant included bolus infusion of 0.05 mumol/kg/min for 5 min followed by a continuous infusion of 0.0025 mumol/kg/min for 40 min. Thereafter, a high dose of 0.2 mumol/kg/min for 5 min and 0.01 mumol/kg/min for 40 min was given. PR, QRS, AH, and HV intervals did not change during almokalant administration. The QT interval increased dose dependently from 337 +/- 17 to 442 +/- 20 ms at high dose (p < 0.05). Atrial refractory periods (AERP) were prolonged dose dependently at a 500-ms pacing cycle length from 178 +/- 15 at baseline to 227 +/- 27 and 253 +/- 23 ms during low- and high-dose almokalant infusion, respectively. For pacing cycle lengths of 400 and 300 ms, these values were 180 +/- 11, 207 +/- 25, and 259 +/- 34 and 157 +/- 12, 193 +/- 21, and 234 +/- 28 ms, respectively. At a pacing cycle length of 500 ms, mean ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) was 270 +/- 25 ms as compared with 306 +/- 24 and 337 +/- 17 during low and high dose, respectively. A similar pattern of VERP changes during both low- and high-dose infusion was noted at the shorter pacing cycle lengths, with an increase from 240 +/- 23 to 274 +/- 22 and 279 +/- 24 ms during a 400-ms cycle length and from 210 +/- 17 to 235 +/- 19 and 234 +/- 21 ms during a 300-ms cycle length. The ratio of the VERP and ventricular monophasic action potential duration (VAPD) did not change significantly. The Wenckebach cycle length increased by 36 +/- 36 and 83 +/- 37 ms with low- and high-dose almokalant infusion, respectively. The percent increase of AERP at pacing cycle lengths of 500, 400, and 300 ms during high-dose almokalant was 42, 44, and 49%, respectively; these increases for VERP were 25, 16, and 11%, respectively. In conclusion, prolongation of refractoriness by almokalant was more pronounced at the atrial than the ventricular level. Prolongation of refractoriness was maintained at short pacing cycle lengths especially in the atrium, indicating absence of reverse-use dependence of almokalant in the porcine heart. The marked atrial effects, paralleled by atrioventricular conduction slowing, and the absence of reverse use-dependence all contribute to the feasibility of use of almokalant, in particular in the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8847879     DOI: 10.1097/00005344-199604000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  8 in total

Review 1.  New developments in atrial antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Atrial-selective sodium channel block strategy to suppress atrial fibrillation: ranolazine versus propafenone.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Luiz Belardinelli; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 3.  Novel pharmacological targets for the rhythm control management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  How Do Atrial-Selective Drugs Differ From Antiarrhythmic Drugs Currently Used in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2008

5.  AZD1305 exerts atrial predominant electrophysiological actions and is effective in suppressing atrial fibrillation and preventing its reinduction in the dog.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Andrew C Zygmunt; Jose M Di Diego; Gunilla Linhardt; Leif Carlsson; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 6.  New pharmacological strategies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Atrial-selective sodium channel block as a strategy for suppression of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; José M Di Diego; Andrew C Zygmunt; Luiz Belardinelli; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Atrial-selective sodium channel block for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Expert Opin Emerg Drugs       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.