Literature DB >> 8847642

Experimentally derived model for the locomotor pattern generator in the Xenopus embryo.

N Dale1.   

Abstract

1. Simulations of Xenopus embryo spinal neurons were endowed with Hodgkin-Huxley-style models of voltage-dependent Na+, Ca2+, slow K+ and fast K+ currents together with a Na(+)-dependent K+ current. The parameters describing the activation, inactivation and relaxation of these currents were derived from previous voltage-clamp studies of Xenopus embryo spinal neurons. Each of the currents was present at realistic densities. 2. The model neurons fired repetitively in response to current injection. The Ca2+ current was essential for repetitive firing in response to current injection. The fast K+ current appeared mainly to control spike width, whereas the slow K+ current exerted a powerful influence on the reptitive firing properties of the neurons without markedly affecting spike width. 3. The properties of the model neurons could be made more consistent with those previously reported for Xenopus embryo neurons during intracellular recordings in vivo, if the shunting effect of the sharp microelectrode was incorporated into the model. 4. The model neurons were then used to create a simplified version of the spinal network that controls swimming in the frog embryo. This model network could generate the motor pattern for swimming: the activity between the left and right sides alternated with a cycle period that varied from 50 to 120 ms. This is very similar to the range of cycle periods observed in the real embryo. The shunting effect of the microelectrode was once again taken into account. 5. Reductions of the K+ currents perturbed the motor pattern and gave three forms of aberrant motor activity very similar to those previously seen during the application of K+ channel blockers to the real embryo. The ability to generate the correct motor pattern for swimming in the model depended on the balance between the K+ currents and the inward Na+ and Ca2+ currents rather than their absolute values. 6. The model network could generate a motor pattern for swimming over a very wide range of excitatory (2-10 nS) and inhibitory (2-400 nS) synaptic strengths. Rough estimates of the physiological synaptic strengths in the real circuit (around 20-60 nS for inhibition and 2-5 nS for excitation) fall within the range of synaptic strengths that gave simulation of the swimming motor pattern in the model. 7. The cycle period of the motor activity in the model shortened either as the excitatory synapses were strengthened or as the inhibitory synapses were weakened. 8. The prediction that the strength of the mid-cycle inhibition determines cycle period has been tested by using low levels of strychnine to reduce glycinergic reciprocal inhibition in a graded manner in the real embryo. As the inhibition was reduced, the cycle period of fictive swimming in the embryo shortened by amounts very close to those predicted by the model. 9. This new experimentally derived model can replicate many of the known features of fictive swimming in the real embryo and may be of value as an analytical tool in attempting to understand how the spinal circuitry of the Xenopus embryo and related amphibian embryos control a variety of motor behaviours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8847642      PMCID: PMC1156774          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp021067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  50 in total

1.  Apamin blocks the slow AHP in lamprey and delays termination of locomotor bursts.

Authors:  R Hill; T Matsushima; J Schotland; S Grillner
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  The role of premotor interneurons in phase-dependent modulation of a cutaneous reflex during swimming in Xenopus laevis embryos.

Authors:  K T Sillar; A Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The neuroanatomy of an amphibian embryo spinal cord.

Authors:  A Roberts; J D Clarke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Intracellular recordings from spinal neurons during 'swimming' in paralysed amphibian embryos.

Authors:  A Roberts; J A Khan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1982-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Slow excitatory postsynaptic currents mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors on cultured mouse central neurones.

Authors:  I D Forsythe; G L Westbrook
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  GABAB receptors modulate an omega-conotoxin-sensitive calcium current that is required for synaptic transmission in the Xenopus embryo spinal cord.

Authors:  M J Wall; N Dale
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Fluctuating responses at a central synapse: n of binomial fit predicts number of stained presynaptic boutons.

Authors:  H Korn; A Triller; A Mallet; D S Faber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Tonic and phasic synaptic input to spinal cord motoneurons during fictive locomotion in frog embryos.

Authors:  S R Soffe; A Roberts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A large, sustained Na(+)- and voltage-dependent K+ current in spinal neurons of the frog embryo.

Authors:  N Dale
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Patterns of synaptic drive to ventrally located spinal neurones in Rana temporaria embryos during rhythmic and non-rhythmic motor responses.

Authors:  S R Soffe; K T Sillar
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  36 in total

1.  Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptors and spontaneous presynaptic transmitter release at developing excitatory spinal synapses.

Authors:  J Rohrbough; N C Spitzer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Modulation of K(+) currents in Xenopus spinal neurons by p2y receptors: a role for ATP and ADP in motor pattern generation.

Authors:  Paul Brown; Nicholas Dale
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Coordinated motor activity in simulated spinal networks emerges from simple biologically plausible rules of connectivity.

Authors:  Nicholas Dale
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Modelling inter-segmental coordination of neuronal oscillators: synaptic mechanisms for uni-directional coupling during swimming in Xenopus tadpoles.

Authors:  Mark J Tunstall; Alan Roberts; S R Soffe
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Mechanisms of rhythm generation in a spinal locomotor network deprived of crossed connections: the lamprey hemicord.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cangiano; Sten Grillner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Metachronal propagation of motoneurone burst activation in isolated spinal cord of newborn rat.

Authors:  Jean-René Cazalets
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Glycine receptors regulate interneuron differentiation during spinal network development.

Authors:  Jonathan R McDearmid; Meijiang Liao; Pierre Drapeau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Role of type-specific neuron properties in a spinal cord motor network.

Authors:  Bart Sautois; Stephen R Soffe; Wen-Chang Li; Alan Roberts
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 9.  Roles for inhibition: studies on networks controlling swimming in young frog tadpoles.

Authors:  Alan Roberts; Wen-Chang Li; S R Soffe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Differential inhibition of N and P/Q Ca2+ currents by 5-HT1A and 5-HT1D receptors in spinal neurons of Xenopus larvae.

Authors:  Q Q Sun; N Dale
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.