Literature DB >> 8847138

Low efficiency of cytologic screening for cancer in situ of the cervix in older women.

L Gustafsson1, P Sparén, M Gustafsson, B Pettersson, E Wilander, R Bergström, H O Adami.   

Abstract

Cytologic screening for cervical cancer has proven to be beneficial in many countries, although the value of this intervention in women older than 50 years remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficiency of detecting cancer in situ by means of a cytologic smear at different ages, with special emphasis on the benefit of screening in women above the age of 50. We analyzed 466,275 smears taken in an open cohort of 118,890 women in Sweden between 1969 and 1988. The number of cancers in situ detected per 1,000 smears, the detection ratio, was used as an outcome measure in univariate analyses and in multivariate regression models. Cancer in situ was detected in 1,076 women in the study cohort. The detection ratio peaked at ages 30 to 34 and decreased heavily during the next 15 years of age. The efficiency of taking smears at ages above 50 was only 20 per cent (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14-0.26) of that at ages 30 to 34. These results were not changed when adjusting for time period and time interval since the previous smear. In spite of a high incidence of invasive cervical cancer in older women, the benefit of cytologic screening to detect cancer in situ above the age of 50 is uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8847138     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910630610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  15 in total

1.  Cervical cancer in the screening era: who fell victim in spite of successful screening programs?

Authors:  B Folke Pettersson; Kristina Hellman; Roxane Vaziri; Sonia Andersson; Ann-Cathrin Hellström
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Self-sampling and HPV testing or ordinary Pap-smear in women not regularly attending screening: a randomised study.

Authors:  I Wikström; M Lindell; K Sanner; E Wilander
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Performance of papanicolaou testing and detection of cervical carcinoma in situ in participants of organized cervical cancer screening in South Korea.

Authors:  Mi Ah Han; Kui Son Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Kyu Won Jung; Sokbom Kang; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cervical Cancer Screening in Postmenopausal Women: Is It Time to Move Toward Primary High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Screening?

Authors:  Jaime M Kiff; Madisen Cotter; Elizabeth G Munro; Molly E Leonard; Terry K Morgan; Amanda S Bruegl
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  Trends in cancer of the cervix uteri in Sweden following cytological screening.

Authors:  R Bergström; P Sparén; H O Adami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Self-sampling of the vaginal fluid at home combined with high-risk HPV testing.

Authors:  K Sanner; I Wikström; A Strand; M Lindell; E Wilander
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Incidence of cervical cancer after several negative smear results by age 50: prospective observational study.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Elsebeth Lynge; Caspar Looman; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Rob Boer; Dik Habbema
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-04-24

8.  Impact of organised cervical screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in migrant women in Australia.

Authors:  Nayyereh Aminisani; Bruce K Armstrong; Sam Egger; Karen Canfell
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Do women >or=50 years of age need as much screening as women <50 years after they have had negative screening results?

Authors:  P Armaroli; F Gallo; A Bellomi; S Ciatto; D Consonni; D Davi; P Giorgi-Rossi; A Iossa; E Mancini; C Naldoni; E Polla; G Ronco; M Serafini; V Vergini; L Zanier; M Zappa; N Segnan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Uneven distribution of human papillomavirus 16 in cervical carcinoma in situ and squamous cell carcinoma in older females: A retrospective database study.

Authors:  Sonia Andersson; Miriam Mints; Ulf Gyllensten; Monica Lindell; Inger Gustavsson; Mats Lambe; Erik Wilander
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.