Literature DB >> 88462

Sputum screening by Nomarski interference contrast microscopy.

D F Welch, M T Kelly.   

Abstract

Gram-stained smears of specimens submitted for sputum cultures were compared with direct wet mounts examined by Nomarski interference contrast microscopy (NIM) for enumeration of squamous epithelial cells (EPC) and leukocytes (WBC). The results obtained by the two methods were comparable, but specimens were more rapidly screened and cell types were more readily differentiated by NIM. Specimens submitted for sputum culture over a 3-month period were examined for EPC and WBC by NIM. Twenty-two percent of the specimens had greater than 25 EPC/field or a predominance of EPC (class I), 30% had greater than 25 EPC and greater than 25 WBC/field (class II), and 48% had greater than 25 WBC/field or a predominance of WBC (class III). The clinical relevance of the culture results was determined by reviewing the records of patients whose specimens were included in the study. Class I specimens provided only 30% clinically relevant culture results. Specimens in class II provided useful culture results in 63% of the patients, and 96% of those in class III provided clinically relevant information. The results confirm the value of sputum screening and demonstrate that NIM provides a rapid, simple, and accurate method for sputum screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 88462      PMCID: PMC273067          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.9.4.520-524.1979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.

Authors:  P R Murray; J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Lung biopsy in immunocompromised hosts.

Authors:  R L Greenman; P T Goodall; D King
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Microscopic and bacteriological comparison of paired sputa and transtracheal aspirates.

Authors:  R W Geckler; D H Gremillion; C K McAllister; C Ellenbogen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Misinformation from sputum cultures without microscopic examination.

Authors:  H S Heineman; J K Chawla; W M Lopton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Bacterial sputum cultures. A clinician's viewpoint.

Authors:  R E Van Scoy
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  The nonvalue of sputum culture in the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1971-06

Review 7.  Constituents of sputum: a simple method.

Authors:  R L Epstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Examination of sputum cells.

Authors:  S Chodosh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-04-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Transtracheal aspiration in the evaluation of patients with pneumonia.

Authors:  H H Hahn; H N Beaty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 25.391

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Gram stain and Nomarski optics for screening sputum specimens before culture.

Authors:  L G Reimer; A Kepas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Differentiation of Haemophilus spp. in Respiratory isolate cultures by an indole spot test.

Authors:  D F Welch; P A Ahlin; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.