Literature DB >> 8845603

International comparison of hip fracture rates in 1988-89.

W E Bacon1, S Maggi, A Looker, T Harris, C R Nair, J Giaconi, R Honkanen, S C Ho, K A Peffers, O Torring, R Gass, N Gonzalez.   

Abstract

A comparison of hip fracture rates among nine countries (Canada, Chile, Finland, Hong Kong, Scotland, Sweden, Switzerland, the United States and Venezuela) was made using national hospital discharge data for the same time interval. The rates increased by age and were higher for females than males in all nine countries. When based on overall discharge rates, the incidence of hip fracture appeared high in three European countries (Finland, Scotland and Sweden) relative to the other countries. However, when transfer cases were removed and adjustments made for differences in case definition, the risk of hip fracture for both men and women was much similar among the four European and two North American countries, but higher than in Hong Kong. Rates of fracture were lowest in Venezuela and Chile, varying from three to 11 times less than for residents of the other seven countries. Although there are limitations in using hospital discharge data as a measure of incidence, the wide variation in the risk of hip fracture across the nine countries appears real but differences between North American and north European countries may not be as great as previously reported. Such cross-national comparisons may help clarify different etiologic hypotheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8845603     DOI: 10.1007/bf01626541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  32 in total

1.  Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group.

Authors:  J A Grisso; J L Kelsey; B L Strom; G Y Chiu; G Maislin; L A O'Brien; S Hoffman; F Kaplan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Geographic variation in the occurrence of hip fractures among the elderly white US population.

Authors:  W E Bacon; G S Smith; S P Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Methodological issues in using hospital discharge data to determine the incidence of hospitalized injuries.

Authors:  G S Smith; J A Langlois; J S Buechner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Osteoporosis and fracture of the femoral neck in the South African Bantu.

Authors:  L Solomon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1968-02

5.  Parity, lactation and hip fracture.

Authors:  S Hoffman; J A Grisso; J L Kelsey; M D Gammon; L A O'Brien
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Decreased incidence of hip fracture in Hispanics, Asians, and blacks: California Hospital Discharge Data.

Authors:  S L Silverman; R E Madison
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Fractured proximal femur in Newcastle upon Tyne.

Authors:  J G Evans
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Gullberg; E Allander; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Increasing age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures in Finland: the number and incidence of fractures in 1970-1991 and prediction for the future.

Authors:  J Parkkari; P Kannus; S Niemi; M Pasanen; M Järvinen; P Lüthje; I Vuori
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  The burden of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  The perspective of the International Osteoporosis Foundation on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Ego Seeman; Olof Johnell; Rene Rizzoli; Pierre Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  S Y Cheng; A R Levy; K A Lefaivre; P Guy; L Kuramoto; B Sobolev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Latitude, socioeconomic prosperity, mobile phones and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  O Johnell; F Borgstrom; B Jonsson; J Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Low incidence of hip fractures in an equatorial area.

Authors:  Francisco Airton Castro da Rocha; Ana Regina Ribeiro
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone mineral density at the hip in Norwegian women and men--prevalence of osteoporosis depends on chosen references: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Nina Emaus; Tone K Omsland; Luai Awad Ahmed; Guri Grimnes; Monica Sneve; Gro K Berntsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Hip fracture incidence among elderly Hispanics.

Authors:  D S Lauderdale; S J Jacobsen; S E Furner; P S Levy; J A Brody; J Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Comparison of hip fracture incidence and trends between Germany and Austria 1995-2004: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Eva Mann; Gabriele Meyer; Burkhart Haastert; Andrea Icks
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women: a study based on data from Sweden.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Anders Oden; Frederik Borgstrom; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark.

Authors:  Peter Vestergaard; Lars Rejnmark; Leif Mosekilde
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-12       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.