Literature DB >> 8844079

A controlled study of longitudinal IQ changes in females and males with fragile X syndrome.

C Wright-Talamante1, A Cheema, J E Riddle, D W Luckey, A K Taylor, R J Hagerman.   

Abstract

The aim is this study is to compare the longitudinal changes in IQ scores of females and males with fragile X syndrome and controls and to assess the impact on IQ of molecular variations of the FMR-1 gene in males. Medical records from the child development unit at a university-affiliated children's hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Chart review yielded 35 males with fragile X (19 with a fully methylated full mutation, 9 with a mosaic pattern, and 7 with a partially unmethylated full mutation) 16 females with fragile X and a full mutation, 9 female controls, and 9 male controls who had repeated standardized IQ testing separated by 7 months to 13 years. The differences between the first and last IQ scores from the same IQ test were compared by t tests and subsequently by analysis of variance. Overall, a significant IQ decline was seen in 10/35 (28%) of fragile X males, 0/9 (0%) of control males, 6/16 (36%) of fragile X females, and 1/9 (11%) of control females. The initial t tests and analysis of variance showed a significant difference in IQ (p = 0.02) between fragile X males and control males but did not show a significant difference between males and females with fragile X syndrome or between fragile X and control females. When an analysis of covariance was carried out with the initial IQ as a covariable, a significant difference persisted between fragile X and control males, with a greater IQ decline in fragile X males. There were limitations in using the same IQ test. A comparison among the molecular subgroups of males yielded a significant IQ decline in 3/9 (33%) of mosaic males, 6/19 (32%) of fully methylated full mutation males, and 1/7 (14%) of partially methylated full mutation males. An analysis of covariance using the initial IQ and the intertest interval as covariables demonstrated significant differences between the fragile X molecular subgroups and the controls. Our findings show that a substantial percentage of both male and female fragile X patients and female control patients demonstrated significant IQ decline. There was a significant difference in the IQ change between fragile X and control males. There were no significant differences between fragile X and female controls. There were also significant differences in IQ decline among males with different molecular patterns compared with controls. Males with a mosaic pattern versus control males had the most significant decline of the molecular subtypes. Although the numbers were limited, there was no significant IQ decline in males with less than 50% methylation of the full mutation. This suggests that a small amount of FMR-1 protein production, which is often seen in males with less than 50% methylation, protects against significant IQ decline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8844079     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960809)64:2<350::AID-AJMG23>3.0.CO;2-D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  18 in total

1.  Cognitive aspects of Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Lillie B Huddleston; Jeannie Visootsak; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-05-29

Review 2.  Fragile X syndrome. Molecular and clinical insights and treatment issues.

Authors:  R J Hagerman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-02

Review 3.  Public Health Literature Review of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Melissa Raspa; Anne C Wheeler; Catharine Riley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Autonomic regulation in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Keri J Heilman; Emily R Harden; Danielle M Zageris; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Stephen W Porges
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Autism spectrum disorder in fragile X syndrome: a longitudinal evaluation.

Authors:  R Nick Hernandez; Rachel L Feinberg; Rebecca Vaurio; Natalie M Passanante; Richard E Thompson; Walter E Kaufmann
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Longitudinal changes in intellectual development in children with Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Scott S Hall; David D Burns; Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2008-03-18

7.  Aging in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Agustini Utari; Evan Adams; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Alyssa Chavez; Felicia Scaggs; Lily Ngotran; Antoniya Boyd; David Hessl; Louise W Gane; Flora Tassone; Nicole Tartaglia; Maureen A Leehey; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Secondary medical diagnosis in fragile X syndrome with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Catalina García-Nonell; Eugenia Rigau Ratera; Susan Harris; David Hessl; Michele Y Ono; Nicole Tartaglia; Emily Marvin; Flora Tassone; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 9.  Unstable mutations in the FMR1 gene and the phenotypes.

Authors:  Danuta Loesch; Randi Hagerman
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Phonological awareness and reading in boys with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Suzanne M Adlof; Jessica Klusek; Svetlana V Shinkareva; Marissa L Robinson; Jane E Roberts
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 8.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.