Literature DB >> 8843891

Stress-induced laboratory blood pressure in relation to ambulatory blood pressure and left ventricular mass among borderline hypertensive and normotensive individuals.

A Georgiades1, C Lemne, U de Faire, K Lindvall, M Fredrikson.   

Abstract

Our primary aim in the present study was to investigate the association between blood pressure measured in the laboratory and in the ambulatory state in a group of middle-aged borderline hypertensive men and age-matched normotensive control subjects. In addition, we examined the relation between stress-induced blood pressure measurements and left ventricular mass. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured noninvasively during a standardized laboratory stress protocol and four times per hour throughout 24 hours. Borderline hypertensive subjects had significantly higher systolic and diastolic pressures than normotensive subjects during both the daytime (systolic pressure, 141.1 +/- 9.7 versus 130.9 +/- 8.6 mm Hg; diastolic pressure, 88.8 +/- 7.0 versus 79.4 +/- 6.2 mm Hg, P < .001) and nighttime (systolic pressure, 114.0 +/- 9.9 versus 107.1 +/- 8.3 mm Hg; diastolic pressure, 71.5 +/- 7.5 versus 64.6 +/- 7.2 mm Hg, P < .001). The borderline hypertensive group also displayed increased systolic pressure reactivity in the laboratory compared with the normotensive group. The groups did not differ significantly in left ventricular mass (index). In both borderline hypertensive and normotensive individuals, blood pressure levels during stress testing were closely related to ambulatory blood pressure levels (r = .51 to .82). Furthermore, stress-induced blood pressure levels were significantly correlated to left ventricular mass in borderline hypertensive (r = .33 to .40) but not normotensive subjects. Since stress-induced blood pressure levels were significantly associated with both ambulatory blood pressure levels and left ventricular mass in borderline hypertensive subjects, the addition of standardized stress testing to casual blood pressure measurements may improve risk estimation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8843891     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.28.4.641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  8 in total

1.  Hostility moderates the effects of social support and intimacy on blood pressure in daily social interactions.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Vella; Thomas W Kamarck; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 2.  Cardiovascular and autonomic reactivity to psychological stress: Neurophysiological substrates and links to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Annie T Ginty; Thomas E Kraynak; James P Fisher; Peter J Gianaros
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.145

3.  Financial stress in late adulthood and diverse risks of incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in women and men.

Authors:  Axel C Carlsson; Bengt Starrin; Bruna Gigante; Karin Leander; Mai-Lis Hellenius; Ulf de Faire
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Income inequality and cardiovascular disease risk factors in a highly unequal country: a fixed-effects analysis from South Africa.

Authors:  Kafui Adjaye-Gbewonyo; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian; Mauricio Avendano
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-03-06

5.  A single session of exercise reduces blood pressure reactivity to stress: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Igor M Mariano; Ana Luiza Amaral; Paula A B Ribeiro; Guilherme M Puga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Cardiovascular reactivity, stress, and physical activity.

Authors:  Chun-Jung Huang; Heather E Webb; Michael C Zourdos; Edmund O Acevedo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  Exercise Hypertension.

Authors:  Martin G Schultz; James E Sharman
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-11

8.  Blood Pressure Reactivity to Psychological Stress in Young Adults and Cognition in Midlife: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Yuichiro Yano; Hongyan Ning; Jared P Reis; Cora E Lewis; Lenore J Launer; R Nick Bryan; Kristine Yaffe; Stephen Sidney; Emiliano Albanese; Philip Greenland; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Kiang Liu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.