Literature DB >> 8843257

Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study.

J M Becker1, M T Dayton, V W Fazio, D E Beck, S J Stryker, S D Wexner, B G Wolff, P L Roberts, L E Smith, S A Sweeney, M Moore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative abdominal adhesions are associated with numerous complications, including small bowel obstruction, difficult and dangerous reoperations, and infertility. A sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane (HA membrane) was developed to reduce formation of postoperative adhesions. The objectives of our prospective study were to assess the incidence of adhesions that recurred after a standardized major abdominal operation using direct laparoscopic peritoneal imaging and to determine the safety and effectiveness of HA membrane in preventing postoperative adhesions. STUDY
DESIGN: Eleven centers enrolled 183 patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis who were scheduled for colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting-loop ileostomy. Before abdominal closure, patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive HA membrane placed under the midline incision. At ileostomy closure eight to 12 weeks later, laparoscopy was used to evaluate the incidence, extent, and severity of adhesion formation to the midline incision.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 175 assessable patients. While only five (6 percent) of 90 control patients had no adhesions, 43 (51 percent) of 85 patients receiving HA membrane were free of adhesions (p < 0.00000000001). The mean percent of the incision length involved was 63 percent in the control group, significantly greater than the 23 percent observed in patients who received HA membrane (p < 0.001). Dense adhesions were observed in 52 (58 percent) of the 90 control patients, but in only 13 (15 percent) of the 85 receiving HA membrane (P < 0.0001). Comparison of the incidence of specific adverse events between the groups did not identify a difference (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first controlled, prospective evaluation of postoperative abdominal adhesion formation and prevention after general abdominal surgery using standardized, direct peritoneal visualization. In this study, HA membrane was safe and significantly reduced the incidence, extent, and severity of postoperative abdominal adhesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8843257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  146 in total

Review 1.  A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR).

Authors:  M S Wilson; H Ellis; D Menzies; B J Moran; M C Parker; J N Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Wietske W Vrijland; Larissa N L Tseng; Heert J M Eijkman; Wim C J Hop; Jack J Jakimowicz; Piet Leguit; Laurents P S Stassen; Dingeman J Swank; Robert Haverlag; H Jaap Bonjer; Hans Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Paradoxical outcome after use of hyaluronate barrier to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  J P Trickett; R M Rainsbury; R Green
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Novel technique of overlaying a poly-L: -lactic acid nanosheet for adhesion prophylaxis and fixation of intraperitoneal onlay polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujino; Manabu Kinoshita; Akihiro Saitoh; Hidekazu Yano; Kahoko Nishikawa; Toshinori Fujie; Keiichi Iwaya; Minoru Kakihara; Shinji Takeoka; Daizoh Saitoh; Yuji Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The effectiveness of poloxamer 407-based new anti-adhesive material in a laminectomy model in rats.

Authors:  Chang Hun Yu; Jae Hyup Lee; Hae-Ri Baek; Hwa Nam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; J Jeekel; H J van Geldorp; D J Swank; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  James M Becker; Arthur F Stucchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Intra-abdominal adhesion prevention: are we getting any closer?

Authors:  James M Becker; Arthur F Stucchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.

Authors:  Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; David Hollemann; Christine Tapprich; Bernhard Krämer; Christian Wallwiener; Helmut Hierlemann; Rolf Zehbe; Heinrich Planck; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Investigation into the optimal prosthetic material for wound healing of abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Adem Akcakaya; Ibrahim Aydogdu; Bulent Citgez
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.