Literature DB >> 8842582

Shorter pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives decreases follicular development.

J Spona1, M Elstein, W Feichtinger, H Sullivan, F Lüdicke, U Müller, B Düsterberg.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine the suppressive effect on ovarian activity of 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol plus 75 micrograms gestodene administered for 21 or 23 days. The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial in 60 women. A pre-treatment cycle, three treatment cycles and a post-treatment period were monitored by ovarian ultrasound and by LH, FSH, 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone measurements every other day. No ovulation and no luteinized, unruptured follicle were observed. Suppression of ovarian activity was more pronounced by the 23-day regimen. 17 beta-Estradiol serum levels during the last six days of a cycle and during the first six days of the next cycle were significantly less (p < 0.05) in the 23-day regimen. The superiority of the 23-day regimen in comparison to the 21-day regimen with regard to the suppression of ovarian activity was shown in this study. The observed differences in the 17 beta-estradiol levels and follicular development between a 21-day and 23-day preparation combine to suggest that shortening the pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives may increase the contraceptive safety margin in women on low-dose formulations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Austria; Biology; Clinical Research; Clinical Trials; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Estrogen; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Methods; Developed Countries; Endocrine System; Ethinyl Estradiol; Europe; Family Planning; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Gestodene; Gonadotropins; Gonadotropins, Pituitary; Hormones; Human Volunteers; Luteinizing Hormone; Northern Europe; Oral Contraceptives; Oral Contraceptives, Combined; Ovarian Effects; Ovary; Physiology; Research Methodology; Research Report; United Kingdom; Urogenital System; Western Europe

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8842582     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(96)00137-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  23 in total

1.  Matched-pairs analysis of ovarian suppression during oral vs. vaginal hormonal contraceptive use.

Authors:  Kelsey A Petrie; Anu H Torgal; Carolyn L Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Cycle control and bleeding pattern of a 24/4 regimen of drospirenone 3 mg/ethinylestradiol 20 μg compared with a 21/7 regimen of desogestrel 150 μg/ethinylestradiol 20 μg: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Leena Anttila; Walter Neunteufel; Felice Petraglia; Joachim Marr; Michael Kunz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  20 µg versus >20 µg estrogen combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; Kavita Nanda; David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 4.  Long-cycle treatment with oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Inka Wiegratz; Herbert Kuhl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Oral contraceptive use and bone density in adolescent and young adult women.

Authors:  Delia Scholes; Laura Ichikawa; Andrea Z LaCroix; Leslie Spangler; Jeannette M Beasley; Susan Reed; Susan M Ott
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6.  Ovarian follicular development during the use of oral contraception: a review.

Authors:  Angela R Baerwald; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2004-01

Review 7.  Drospirenone/ethinylestradiol 3mg/20microg (24/4 day regimen): a review of its use in contraception, premenstrual dysphoric disorder and moderate acne vulgaris.

Authors:  Caroline Fenton; Keri Wellington; Marit D Moen; Dean M Robinson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Systematic Review of Ovarian Activity and Potential for Embryo Formation and Loss during the Use of Hormonal Contraception.

Authors:  Donna Harrison; Cara Buskmiller; Monique Chireau; Lester A Ruppersberger; Patrick P Yeung
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-01-03

Review 9.  The scientific body of knowledge - Whose body does it serve? A spotlight on oral contraceptives and women's health factors in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Caitlin M Taylor; Laura Pritschet; Emily G Jacobs
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.606

10.  A comparative efficacy of low-dose combined oral contraceptives containing desogestrel and drospirenone in premenstrual symptoms.

Authors:  Jirath Wichianpitaya; Surasak Taneepanichskul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.