PURPOSE: The authors prospectively investigated the effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia on the corneal endothelium. METHODS: Quantitative computer-assisted morphometric analysis of central and peripheral corneal endothelial cells was performed on 142 myopic eyes before and at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after PRK. The mean age of the subjects was 37 years (range, 21-66 years). Ninety-one (64%) of them had a history of contact lens wear. Mean attempted correction was -3.9 diopters (range, -1.6 to -6.0 diopters). RESULTS: The mean preoperative endothelial cell density was 2660 cells/mm2 centrally and 2776 cells/mm2 peripherally. There was no change in central endothelial cell density at any of the postoperative examinations. The peripheral cell density decreased 4.1% (P = 0.003) at 3 months and 6.2% (P = 0.0001) at 1 year. However, the peripheral cell density was not significantly different from the preoperative value at 2 years. The peripheral coefficient of variation of cell size was 7.8% lower 2 years postoperatively than it was preoperatively, and this improvement was attributable to cessation of contact lens wear after PRK. The decrease in peripheral endothelial cell density at 1 year correlated with the amount of attempted correction, but there was no correlation between attempted correction and the change in central or peripheral endothelial cell density 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: For the correction of up to 6.0 D of myopia, PRK causes no detectable changes in central corneal endothelial cell density, but it does cause a transient, modest loss of peripheral corneal endothelial cells at 1 year. Variations in endothelial cell shape caused by contact lens wear resolve after PRK.
PURPOSE: The authors prospectively investigated the effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia on the corneal endothelium. METHODS: Quantitative computer-assisted morphometric analysis of central and peripheral corneal endothelial cells was performed on 142 myopic eyes before and at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after PRK. The mean age of the subjects was 37 years (range, 21-66 years). Ninety-one (64%) of them had a history of contact lens wear. Mean attempted correction was -3.9 diopters (range, -1.6 to -6.0 diopters). RESULTS: The mean preoperative endothelial cell density was 2660 cells/mm2 centrally and 2776 cells/mm2 peripherally. There was no change in central endothelial cell density at any of the postoperative examinations. The peripheral cell density decreased 4.1% (P = 0.003) at 3 months and 6.2% (P = 0.0001) at 1 year. However, the peripheral cell density was not significantly different from the preoperative value at 2 years. The peripheral coefficient of variation of cell size was 7.8% lower 2 years postoperatively than it was preoperatively, and this improvement was attributable to cessation of contact lens wear after PRK. The decrease in peripheral endothelial cell density at 1 year correlated with the amount of attempted correction, but there was no correlation between attempted correction and the change in central or peripheral endothelial cell density 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: For the correction of up to 6.0 D of myopia, PRK causes no detectable changes in central corneal endothelial cell density, but it does cause a transient, modest loss of peripheral corneal endothelial cells at 1 year. Variations in endothelial cell shape caused by contact lens wear resolve after PRK.