Literature DB >> 8841219

Voiding after Burch colposuspension and effects of concomitant pelvic surgery: correlation with preoperative voiding mechanism.

E H Sze1, J R Miklos, M M Karram.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if concomitant abdominal hysterectomy, posterior colporrhaphy, or preoperative voiding mechanism adversely affect the duration of voiding dysfunction experienced after Burch colposuspension.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 154 consecutive women with genuine stress incontinence managed by Burch colposuspension over 4 years. Fifty-three (35%) women underwent colposuspension alone, 33 (22%) underwent colposuspension with posterior colpoperineorrhaphy, and 68 (44%) underwent colposuspension with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). A suprapubic Foley catheter was placed after all operations and removed when the post-void residual urine reached 20% or less of the volume voided on two consecutive attempts.
RESULTS: Women who underwent colposuspension alone, colposuspension with posterior colpoperineorrhaphy, and colposuspension with TAH required a mean duration of 4.3, 4.3, and 4.8 days of postoperative bladder drainage, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. Women who voided with Valsalva maneuver without a detrusor contraction took significantly longer to resume normal micturition than did those who voided with a detrusor contraction with or without Valsalva maneuver, or urethral relaxation alone (mean 9.0 days compared with 3.6, 4.7, and 4.8 days, respectively; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Concomitant abdominal hysterectomy or posterior colpoperineorrhaphy did not prolong voiding dysfunction after colposuspension. Women who voided with Valsalva maneuver and without a detrusor contraction took significantly longer to resume normal micturition after Burch colposuspension with or without concomitant TAH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8841219     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00238-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.

Authors:  Gary E Lemack; Stephen Krauss; Heather Litman; Mary Pat FitzGerald; Toby Chai; Charles Nager; Larry Sirls; Halina Zyczynski; Jan Baker; Keith Lloyd; W D Steers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Risk factors associated with voiding dysfunction after anti-incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Sue-Min Chung; Yeo-Jung Moon; Myung-Jae Jeon; Sei-Kwang Kim; Sang-Wook Bai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Sling incision with associated vaginal wall interposition for obstructed voiding secondary to suburethral sling procedure.

Authors:  M T McLennan; A E Bent
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

4.  The effect of urethral dilatation on pressure flow studies in women with voiding dysfunction and overactive bladder.

Authors:  Maya Basu; Jonathan Duckett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-15

5.  Improving Postoperative Efficiency: An Algorithm for Expedited Void Trials After Urogynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  A Rebecca Meekins; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Cindy L Amundsen; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Alexis A Dieter
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.954

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.