Literature DB >> 8841201

Selective ablation of differentiated cells permits isolation of embryonic stem cell lines from murine embryos with a non-permissive genetic background.

J McWhir1, A E Schnieke, R Ansell, H Wallace, A Colman, A R Scott, A J Kind.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem (ES) cells enable the engineering of precise modifications to the mouse genome by gene targeting. Although there are reports of cultured cell contributions to chimaeras in golden hamster, rat and pig, definitive ES cell lines which contribute to the germline have not been demonstrated in any species but mouse. Among mouse strains, genetic background strongly affects the efficiency of ES isolation, and almost all ES lines in use are derived from strain 129 (refs 1,4,5) or, less commonly, C57BL/6 (refs 6-8). The CBA strain is refractory to ES isolation and there are no published reports of CBA-derived ES lines. Hence, CBA mice may provide a convenient model of ES isolation in other species. In ES derivation it is critical that the primary explant be cultured for a sufficient time to allow multiplication of ES cell progenitors, yet without allowing extensive differentiation. Thus, differences in ES derivation between mouse strains may reflect differences in the control of ES progenitor cells by other lineages within the embryo. Here we describe a strategy to continuously remove differentiated cells by drug selection, which generates germline competent ES lines from genotypes that are non-permissive in the absence of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8841201     DOI: 10.1038/ng1096-223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  18 in total

1.  Pre-selection of integration sites imparts repeatable transgene expression.

Authors:  H Wallace; R Ansell; J Clark; J McWhir
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Genesis of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Mia Buehr; Austin Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  The topographical regulation of embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Patricia Murray; David Edgar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The pursuit of ES cell lines of domesticated ungulates.

Authors:  Neil C Talbot; Le Ann Blomberg
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 5.  Pluripotent stem cell lines.

Authors:  Junying Yu; James A Thomson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The changing role of cell culture in the generation of transgenic livestock.

Authors:  C B Whitelaw; E Farini; J Webster
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse.

Authors:  F A Brook; R L Gardner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Successful derivation of EGFP-transgenic embryonic stem cell line from a genetically non-permissive FVB/N mouse.

Authors:  Gurbind Singh; Tulasigeri M Totiger; Polani B Seshagiri
Journal:  Am J Stem Cells       Date:  2012-06-03

Review 9.  The promise of stem cell research in pigs and other ungulate species.

Authors:  Bhanu Prakash V L Telugu; Toshihiko Ezashi; R Michael Roberts
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.739

10.  Isolation of murine embryonic stem and embryonic germ cells by selective ablation.

Authors:  Ed J Gallagher; Peter Lodge; Ray Ansell; Jim McWhir
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.