Literature DB >> 8840370

The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of fosphenytoin after intramuscular and intravenous administration in neurosurgery patients.

B A Boucher1, C A Feler, J C Dean, D D Michie, B K Tipton, K R Smith, R E Kramer, B Young, B R Parks, A R Kugler.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of fosphenytoin, a water-soluble phenytoin prodrug, after intramuscular and intravenous administration.
DESIGN: Open-label study of intramuscular administration, and double-blind, randomized study of intravenous administration.
SETTING: Six and ten hospitals throughout the United States for the intramuscular and intravenous multicenter studies, respectively. PATIENTS: Neurosurgical patients who required anticonvulsant prophylaxis or treatment.
INTERVENTIONS: In the intramuscular study, 118 patients received loading doses ranging from 480-1500 mg phenytoin equivalents (PE) and daily maintenance doses ranging from 130-1250 mg PE for 3-14 days. In the intravenous study, 88 patients received fosphenytoin and 28 received phenytoin sodium for 3-14 days. Mean +/- SD loading doses and maintenance doses of intravenous fosphenytoin and phenytoin were 1082 +/- 299 mg PE and 411 +/- 221 mg PE, and 1082 +/- 299 mg and 422 +/- 197 mg, respectively. Trough phenytoin concentrations were measured daily in all patients.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intramuscular fosphenytoin was safe and well tolerated, with no irritation found for 99% of all injection site evaluations. Adverse events associated with the drug occurred in 9% of patients, commonly those typical of the parent drug. For intravenous treatment, the frequency of mild irritation at the infusion site was significantly lower in the fosphenytoin group (6%) than in the phenytoin group (25%, p < 0.05). Reductions in infusion rates were required in 17% and 36% of fosphenytoin and phenytoin recipients, respectively. No significant difference was observed relative to adverse events or seizure frequency between the groups. Trough plasma phenytoin concentrations were approximately 10 micrograms/ml or greater in patients receiving at least 3 days of intramuscular and intravenous fosphenytoin. Trough phenytoin concentrations were similar between patients receiving intravenous phenytoin and fosphenytoin on all study days.
CONCLUSION: Fosphenytoin can be administered intramuscularly and intravenously in neurosurgical patients to achieve and maintain therapeutic phenytoin concentrations for up to 14 days. Both routes are safe and well tolerated. Intravenous fosphenytoin is significantly better tolerated than intravenous phenytoin sodium in this patient subset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8840370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  12 in total

1.  Impact of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses on the drug development process: experience at Parke-Davis.

Authors:  S C Olson; H Bockbrader; R A Boyd; J Cook; J R Koup; R L Lalonde; P H Siedlik; J R Powell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Seizure treatment in transplant patients.

Authors:  Paul W Shepard; Erik K St Louis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Fosphenytoin: clinical pharmacokinetics and comparative advantages in the acute treatment of seizures.

Authors:  James H Fischer; Tejal V Patel; Patricia A Fischer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Refractory generalised convulsive status epilepticus : a guide to treatment.

Authors:  Reetta Kälviäinen; Kai Eriksson; Ilkka Parviainen
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  Fosphenytoin. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  S M Holliday; P Benfield; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children. The Status Epilepticus Working Party, Members of the Status Epilepticus Working Party.

Authors:  R Appleton; I Choonara; T Martland; B Phillips; R Scott; W Whitehouse
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Nonconvulsive seizure control in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mariam Wasim; Aatif M Husain
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

Authors:  Trudy Pang; Frank W Drislane
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  Intravenous and Intramuscular Formulations of Antiseizure Drugs in the Treatment of Epilepsy.

Authors:  Sima I Patel; Angela K Birnbaum; James C Cloyd; Ilo E Leppik
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: Prognosis and Recent Advances in Management.

Authors:  Batool F Kirmani; Katherine Au; Lena Ayari; Marita John; Padmashri Shetty; Robert J Delorenzo
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.