Literature DB >> 884029

The Elag-Koln automatic blood pressure recorder. A clinical appraisal.

L E Ramsay, M G Nicholls, P Boyle.   

Abstract

The performance of an Elag-Koln semiautomatic blood pressure recorder was compared with the London School of Hygiene mercury sphygmomanometer in 24 subjects providing a wide range of blood pressure measurements. Readings with the two instruments correlated highly (for systole, r=0-99; for diastole phase 4, r=0-97; for diastole phase 5,r=0-98), and the slopes of the regressions did not differ significantly from unity. Elag-Koln measurements were higher for systole (mean difference 3-7 mmHg,P less than 0-001) and diastole phase 5 (mean difference 7-4 mmHg,P less than 0-001), but agreed closely with diastole phase 4 readings with the London School of Hygiene instrument. The Elag-Koln recorder tested was compact, easy to use, and had acceptable accuracy. This type of instrument deserves further testing to examine its suitability for general use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 884029      PMCID: PMC483318          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.39.7.795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  6 in total

1.  A SPHYGMOMANOMETER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGISTS.

Authors:  G A ROSE; W W HOLLAND; E A CROWLEY
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1964-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Measurement of blood pressure--a routine test in need of standardization.

Authors:  T Thulin; G Andersson; B Scherstén
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  A random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  B M Wright; C F Dore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressure.

Authors:  D R Labarthe; C M Hawkins; R D Remington
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1973-09-20       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Taking the blood pressure.

Authors:  G E King
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1969-09-22       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Defects in sphygmomanometers: an important source of error in blood pressure recording.

Authors:  S Conceiçao; M K Ward; D N Kerr
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-04-10
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  The methodology of blood pressure recording.

Authors:  E B Raftery
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Nurse- and automatic machine-measured blood pressure readings: a comparative study.

Authors:  L K Glass; S M Roell; H L Swain
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The Remler M2000 semi-automatic blood pressure recorder.

Authors:  D G Beevers; C A Bloxham; C I Backhouse; C C Lim; R D Watson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1979-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.