Literature DB >> 8840195

Measuring social inequalities in health in the United States: a historical review, 1900-1950.

N Krieger1, E Fee.   

Abstract

For over two centuries, U.S. vital statistics routinely have been stratified by age, sex, and race, but not by social class. The usual explanation is that U.S. government officials have not considered social class relevant to health. During the first third of the 20th century, however, questions of socio-economic inequalities in morbidity and mortality ranked high on the agenda of federal and other public health agencies, and routine reporting of U.S. vital statistics and health survey data by socioeconomic measures was nearly institutionalized. This history has largely been lost. In this article, the authors focus on the period from 1900 to 1950 and examine how public health researchers and agencies conceptualized and analyzed socioeconomic inequalities in health. Highlights include production, for 1930, of the first U.S. national death rates stratified by social class, in work sponsored by the National Tuberculosis Association and Bureau of the Census, and the Public Health Service's 1935-1936 National Health Survey, which reported morbidity data stratified by socioeconomic measures. Efforts like these were cut short by the onset of World War II and their legacy erased by the Cold War. Recovering this rich history can help inform current debates about collecting and evaluating data on social inequalities in health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8840195     DOI: 10.2190/B3AH-Q5KE-VBGF-NC74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  20 in total

1.  Can we monitor socioeconomic inequalities in health? A survey of U.S. health departments' data collection and reporting practices.

Authors:  N Krieger; J T Chen; G Ebel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Preemptive biopreparedness: can we learn anything from history?

Authors:  E Fee; T M Brown
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Classification of race and ethnicity: implications for public health.

Authors:  Vickie M Mays; Ninez A Ponce; Donna L Washington; Susan D Cochran
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  An approach to studying social disparities in health and health care.

Authors:  Paula A Braveman; Susan A Egerter; Catherine Cubbin; Kristen S Marchi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  In the name of public health.

Authors:  Anne-Emanuelle Birn; Natalia Molina
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Getting political: racism and urban health.

Authors:  Hillel W Cohen; Mary E Northridge
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Learning From History About Reducing Infant Mortality: Contrasting the Centrality of Structural Interventions to Early 20th-Century Successes in the United States to Their Neglect in Current Global Initiatives.

Authors:  Amiya Bhatia; Nancy Krieger; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Comparing individual-based and household-based measures of social class to assess class inequalities in women's health: a methodological study of 684 US women.

Authors:  N Krieger; J T Chen; J V Selby
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Health Disparities and Diversity.

Authors:  Alfiee M Breland-Noble; Derek MacGregor Griffith
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2017-12

Review 10.  Who and what is a "population"? Historical debates, current controversies, and implications for understanding "population health" and rectifying health inequities.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.