Literature DB >> 8840176

The relationship between ultrasonic volume and actual weight of pathologic uterus.

F T Kung1, S Y Chang.   

Abstract

Our purpose was to assess the correlation between the estimated volume based on ultrasonic measurement in vivo and the actual weight of the diseased uterus after hysterectomy, and then retrospectively tried to establish a simple equation to convert the volume into the weight in grams. A total of 105 women with nonmalignant diseased uteri which were prepared to undergo laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy had had preoperative ultrasound scanning to estimate the uterine size by measuring three dimensions including the length (L), width (W) and anteroposterior (AP) diameter. The uterine volume was calculated by the use of a prolate ellipsoid formula (4/3 x pi x L/2 x W/2 x AP/2). Actual uterine weight was immediately taken after extirpation of the uterus. Linear regression analysis revealed uterine weight (g) = 50.0 + 0.71 x volume (cm3), with correlation coefficient = 0.93 and SE = 49.6 g. There was a close, positive correlation between the estimated uterine volume and actual uterine weight. With utilization of this equation, the uterine size in vivo can thus be expressed as a concrete, objective value in weight instead of "weeks' size' by comparison with pregnant uterus, which has been commonly used in traditional gynecologic practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8840176     DOI: 10.1159/000291886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  5 in total

1.  Prediction of operation time for laparoscopic myomectomy by ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Wen-Chiung Hsu; Jing-Shiang Hwang; Wen-Chun Chang; Su-Cheng Huang; Bor-Ching Sheu; Pao-Ling Torng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Incidence of sarcoma in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications: a population-based study.

Authors:  Francesco Multinu; Jvan Casarin; Lucia Tortorella; Yajue Huang; Amy Weaver; Stefano Angioni; Gian Benedetto Melis; Andrea Mariani; Elizabeth A Stewart; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Evelyn M Schepers; Erik W van Zwet; Andries R H Twijnstra; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Estimation of uterine volume: A comparison between Viewpoint and 3D ultrasound estimation in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ishwari Casikar; Max Mongelli; Shannon Reid; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

5.  The value of minilaparotomy for total hysterectomy for benign uterine disease: a comparative study with conventional Pfannenstiel and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Pedro Royo; Juan Luis Alcázar; Manuel García-Manero; Begoña Olartecoechea; Guillermo López-García
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2009-04-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.