Literature DB >> 8839470

A comparison of methods for measuring trunk list. A simple plumbline is the best.

I P McLean1, M G Gillan, J C Ross, R M Aspden, R W Porter.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Trunk list was measured using three different techniques to compare accuracy, precision, and ease of use.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain a reproducible technique for further studies of the nature, cause, and clinical relevance of trunk list. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Gravity-induced trunk list is a clinical sign that is frequently observed in patients with low back pain and has been associated with intervertebral disc lesions.
METHODS: Patients with trunk list participated in a comparison of three techniques to determine list magnitude and direction. Paired measurements of trunk list were obtained from each patient using three techniques: a plumbline, a projected shadow, and the 3SPACE Isotrak (McDonnell Douglas Electronics Company, Colchester, VT). In addition, intra- and interobserver reliability of list measurement was assessed by comparison of paired measurements by each of two observers.
RESULTS: List measurements assessed by the plumbline and the projected shadow techniques were not significantly different, but the Isotrak produced data that differed significantly (P < 0.05) from both of these techniques. Comparison of intra- and interobserver repeatability of list measurement using the plumbline technique indicated no significant difference between repeated measures by each observer or between two observers.
CONCLUSIONS: A plumbline is the most useful instrument for measuring static trunk list, but its limitations and the need for standardization of measurement technique must be recognized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8839470     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199607150-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  Spinopelvic parameters evaluation in a Brazilian population sample.

Authors:  C J Jacob; I M Cardoso; J L J Batista; T C Maia; B Roncaglio
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-05-29

2.  Preventing Fusion Mass Shift Avoids Postoperative Distal Curve Adding-on in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Mauro Bruzzone; Hiroaki Matsumori; Kin-Cheung Mak; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A non-randomized clinical control trial of Harrison mirror image methods for correcting trunk list (lateral translations of the thoracic cage) in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Deed E Harrison; Rene Cailliet; Joseph W Betz; Donald D Harrison; Christopher J Colloca; Jason W Haas; Tadeusz J Janik; Burt Holland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Spinopelvic balance: new biomechanical insights with clinical implications for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Luciano Bissolotti; Massimiliano Gobbo; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Three-dimensional easy morphological (3-DEMO) classification of scoliosis, part I.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Alberto Negrini; Salvatore Atanasio; Giorgio C Santambrogio
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-12-05

6.  Rasterstereographic Analysis of Lateral Shift in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Case Control Study.

Authors:  Britta K Krautwurst; Jürgen R Paletta; Sylvia Mendoza; Adrian Skwara; Melvin Mohokum
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  A correlation study between in-brace correction, compliance to spinal orthosis and health-related quality of life of patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Siu Ling Chan; Kenneth Mc Cheung; Keith Dk Luk; Kenneth Wh Wong; Man Sang Wong
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-02-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.