Literature DB >> 8839019

Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone.

C A Pattin1, W E Caler, D R Carter.   

Abstract

Fatigue damage accumulation has been demonstrated in living bone and postulated as a stimulus to the bone modeling and remodeling response. Mechanical property degradation is one manifestation of fatigue damage accumulation. This study examines changes in secant modulus and cyclic energy dissipation behavior during axial load-controlled fatigue loading of cortical bone specimens. The findings suggest that secant modulus degradation and cyclic energy dissipation are greatly increased at loading levels above critical damage strain thresholds of 2500 and 4000 mu epsilon in tensile and compressive fatigue, respectively. Tensile and compressive fatigue loading also caused different forms of modulus degradation at loading levels above these thresholds. Bone behaves as a linear viscoelastic material below these thresholds, even after prior property degradation at higher loading levels. Cyclic energy dissipation was proportional to the 2.1 power of the applied effective strain range for all loadings below 2500 mu epsilon. Above 2500 mu epsilon, tensile fatigue loading caused cyclic energy dissipation proportional to the 5.8 power of the applied effective strain range. Compressive fatigue loading dissipated cyclic energy proportional to the 4.9 power of applied effective strain range over 4000 mu epsilon. Lifetime energy dissipation over all fatigue tests to fracture at a single loading level was well fitted by the same power law in the number of cycles to failure raised to the 0.6 power. Loading levels of 2500 mu epsilon in tension and 4000 mu epsilon in compression are within the ranges observed in living animals, and thus these phenomena may play a role in initiating the remodeling response in live bone tissue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8839019     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00156-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  65 in total

1.  Do high impact exercises produce higher tibial strains than running?

Authors:  C Milgrom; A Finestone; Y Levi; A Simkin; I Ekenman; S Mendelson; M Millgram; M Nyska; N Benjuya; D Burr
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Structural and mechanical effects of in vivo fatigue damage induction on murine tendon.

Authors:  Jedd B Sereysky; Nelly Andarawis-Puri; Karl J Jepsen; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Microdamage and bone strength.

Authors:  David Burr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The aging cortex: to crack or not to crack.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Fatigue characterization of a polymer foam to use as a cancellous bone analog material in the assessment of orthopaedic devices.

Authors:  V Palissery; M Taylor; M Browne
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  A combined finite element method and continuum damage mechanics approach to simulate the in vitro fatigue behavior of human cortical bone.

Authors:  M Taylor; N Verdonschot; R Huiskes; P Zioupos
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Relationships between in vivo microdamage and the remarkable regional material and strain heterogeneity of cortical bone of adult deer, elk, sheep and horse calcanei.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Christian L Sybrowsky; Wm Erick Anderson; Frank Chow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Skeletal self-repair: stress fracture healing by rapid formation and densification of woven bone.

Authors:  Brian A Uthgenannt; Michael H Kramer; Joyce A Hwu; Brigitte Wopenka; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  A coupled mechano-biochemical model for bone adaptation.

Authors:  Václav Klika; Maria Angelés Pérez; José Manuel García-Aznar; František Maršík; Manuel Doblaré
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 10.  Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.