Literature DB >> 8838731

Noninvasive ankle distraction: relationship between force, magnitude of distraction, and nerve conduction abnormalities.

P A Dowdy1, B V Watson, A Amendola, J D Brown.   

Abstract

Seven healthy volunteers (14 ankles; four males, 3 females) with no history of ankle or foot pathology were placed in a modified beach chair position on an operating table for ankle distraction using a noninvasive ankle distractor. In-line traction of 0 to 225 N (50 lb) in 22.5-N (5-lb) increments was applied to the ankle. A direct lateral radiograph was obtained at each distraction force. The joint space was measured on the lateral radiographs using electronic microcalipers. Surface recordings of the superficial peroneal, deep peroneal dorsal digital cutaneous, and sural nerves were obtained. The ankle joint space increased progressively from an average 3.1 mm with no force applied to an average 4.2 mm with 225 N (50 lb) distraction force applied. The maximum joint distraction averaged 1.3 mm (range, 0.35 to 2.35 mm). The sensory amplitudes were diminished or absent with increasing time and force of distraction. The decreased amplitudes were most marked after 1 hour of distraction with 135 N (30 lb) or greater distraction force. This correlated with symptoms of paresthesias. The superficial and deep peroneal cutaneous nerves were affected to a much greater extent than the sural nerve. The amplitudes quickly returned to normal values with the weight being released from the ankle. The noninvasive ankle distractor safely increased ankle joint space by more than 1 mm. Distraction with 135 N (30 lb) or more for 1 hour is associated with reversible nerve conduction changes. Based on these findings, we recommend using the noninvasive ankle distraction apparatus for ankle arthroscopy, with up to 135 N (30 lb) of traction applied to the foot for up to 1 hour. Greater force, applied for longer periods, is associated with increasing nerve conduction abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8838731     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(96)90221-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  6 in total

1.  Simple 1-Step Ankle Arthroscopy Distraction.

Authors:  Alicia Unangst; Kevin D Martin
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-12-28

2.  Ankle Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Lateral Ligaments (Ankle Anti-ROLL).

Authors:  Masato Takao; Mark Glazebrook; James Stone; Stéphane Guillo
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-10-23

3.  Distraction-free ankle arthroscopy for anterolateral impingement.

Authors:  Jean Louis Rouvillain; Wael Daoud; Adrian Donica; Emmanuel Garron; André Pierre Uzel
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-13

4.  A novel ultrasound technique for detection of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint: a parametric and feasibility study.

Authors:  Nazli Sarkalkan; Arjo J Loeve; Koen W A van Dongen; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Accessibility to Talar Dome in Neutral Position, Dorsiflexion, or Noninvasive Distraction in Posterior Ankle Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Lena Hirtler; Katarina Schellander; Reinhard Schuh
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2019-05-12       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Visualization of the distal tibial plafond articular surface using four established approaches and the efficacy of instrumented distraction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Holger Kleinertz; Marlon Tessarzyk; Benjamin Schoof; Jakob Valentin Nüchtern; Klaus Püschel; Alexej Barg; Karl-Heinz Frosch
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.374

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.