T Sensky1, C Leger, S Gilmour. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Failure by people on chronic haemodialysis to adhere adequately to dietary and fluid restrictions can have serious medical consequences. Numerous psychosocial factors possibly associated with adherence have been investigated in previous research. However, most previous studies have examined one or a few variables in isolation, and have tended to focus on sociodemographic variables not easily amenable to intervention. Much previous work has tended to ignore potential differences in adherence between male and female dialysands. METHODS: Sociodemographic and psychosocial factors associated with adherence to dietary and fluid restrictions were investigated in 45 people on haemodialysis attending one renal unit, excluding those with a residual urine volume > 500 ml/day. Multiple regression analyses were used to estimate the contribution to adherence of a range of variables, including gender, age, duration of dialysis, affective disturbance, past psychiatric history, health locus of control, social adjustment and social supports. RESULTS: Adherence to diet (measured by predialysis serum potassium) and to fluid restriction (interdialysis weight gain) were not linked, and had different psychosocial correlates. Regression models of four different aspects of adherence revealed very distinct psychosocial correlates, with contributions to adherence from complex interactions between psychosocial and cognitive variables, notably gender, age, social adjustment, health locus of control, and depression. CONCLUSIONS: The findings cast doubt on the results of many previous studies which have used simple models of adherence. Adherence is likely to be influenced in a complex manner by multiple factors including age, gender, locus of control, social adjustment, and past psychiatric history.
BACKGROUND: Failure by people on chronic haemodialysis to adhere adequately to dietary and fluid restrictions can have serious medical consequences. Numerous psychosocial factors possibly associated with adherence have been investigated in previous research. However, most previous studies have examined one or a few variables in isolation, and have tended to focus on sociodemographic variables not easily amenable to intervention. Much previous work has tended to ignore potential differences in adherence between male and female dialysands. METHODS: Sociodemographic and psychosocial factors associated with adherence to dietary and fluid restrictions were investigated in 45 people on haemodialysis attending one renal unit, excluding those with a residual urine volume > 500 ml/day. Multiple regression analyses were used to estimate the contribution to adherence of a range of variables, including gender, age, duration of dialysis, affective disturbance, past psychiatric history, health locus of control, social adjustment and social supports. RESULTS: Adherence to diet (measured by predialysis serum potassium) and to fluid restriction (interdialysis weight gain) were not linked, and had different psychosocial correlates. Regression models of four different aspects of adherence revealed very distinct psychosocial correlates, with contributions to adherence from complex interactions between psychosocial and cognitive variables, notably gender, age, social adjustment, health locus of control, and depression. CONCLUSIONS: The findings cast doubt on the results of many previous studies which have used simple models of adherence. Adherence is likely to be influenced in a complex manner by multiple factors including age, gender, locus of control, social adjustment, and past psychiatric history.
Authors: S Susan Hedayati; Abu T Minhajuddin; Masoud Afshar; Robert D Toto; Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Edwina A Brown; Lina Johansson; Ken Farrington; Hugh Gallagher; Tom Sensky; Fabiana Gordon; Maria Da Silva-Gane; Nigel Beckett; Mary Hickson Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-04-16 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Ian Lynam; Delwyn Catley; Kathy Goggin; Joshua L Rabinowitz; Mary M Gerkovich; Karen Williams; Julie Wright Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2009-05
Authors: Ashley A Gorman; Jessica M Foley; Mark L Ettenhofer; Charles H Hinkin; Wilfred G van Gorp Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Nishank Jain; Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Thomas Carmody; Benji Kurian; Robert D Toto; Ravindra Sarode; S Susan Hedayati Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Michael J Fischer; Elani Streja; Jui-Ting Hsiung; Susan T Crowley; Csaba P Kovesdy; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Wissam M Kourany Journal: Clin Kidney J Date: 2021-06-25